On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 01:05:39PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
> On 11/16/2013 11:37 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
> >> ...
> >> babl-0.1.10 installed without a hitch, but put all of its libraries
> >> and such in "babl-0.1" rather than in "babl".
> >
> > That is correct. Gimp should be getting info from babl.pc:
> >
> > Cflags: -I${includedir}/babl-0.1
> > Libs: -L${libdir} -lbabl-0.1 -lm
>
> That's what is happening alright. Likely the problems with compiling
> gegl affected the above, but I don't see the connection.
>
Snipped from your original mail :
|*===========*===========*===========*===========*===========*
|babl-0.1.10 installed without a hitch, but put all of its libraries
|and such in "babl-0.1" rather than in "babl". Gimp complained about
|that so I had to make a link:
|
|ln -sv /usr/include/babl-0.1/babl /usr/include/babl
|*===========*===========*===========*===========*===========*
I don't have a /usr/include/babl directory or symlink. I've now
compiled and run a DESTDIR install of gimp-2.8.8 to be sure that
there isn't a problem in the current version. I had already built
gegl-0.2.0 and babl-0.1.10. I cannot replicate your problem.
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
