> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:13:47 -0300
> From: Fernando de Oliveira <fam...@yahoo.com.br>
> To: akhiezer <lf...@cruziero.com>,
> BLFS Support List <blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org>
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Iced Tea 2.4.1 and iced tea 2.4.5 sed unknown
> option to `s'
>
.
.
>
> Thanks, akh. Just adding what seems the original link:
>
> http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1665
>
> I have seen that Armin also replied.
>
> I am trying to understand this better, and have found that configure and
> configure.ac have mentions to lsb_release. I am trying to understand if
> it is a required, recommended or optional dependency. However, in one
> machine I do not have it installed and it gives me linux-gnu and builds
> fine, so, I am intending to add as optional.
>
> What do you all think about this? I cannot understand why Christopher's
> is getting n/a.
>
> In the following, I am writing some observations and guesses.
>
> In configure, for 2.4.4, which is a build dir still in place in yet
> another machine, I see:
>
> {{{
> if test -n "$ac_tool_prefix"; then
> # Extract the first word of "${ac_tool_prefix}lsb_release", so it can
> be a program name with args.
> set dummy ${ac_tool_prefix}lsb_release; ac_word=$2
> { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking for $ac_word" >&5
> $as_echo_n "checking for $ac_word... " >&6; }
> if ${ac_cv_path_LSB_RELEASE+:} false; then :
> $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
> else
> case $LSB_RELEASE in
> [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*)
> ac_cv_path_LSB_RELEASE="$LSB_RELEASE" # Let the user override the test
> with a path.
> ;;
> *)
> as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR
> }}}
>
>
> Also, I noticed that he is building at /opt, so probably as root. I have:
>
> {{{
> $ xzgrep -C6 distro_name
> /home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/OpenJDK-1.7.0.51-2.4.5-2014.01.29-18h12m38s.log.xz
> rm -f
> /home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.01.29-18h12m38s/icedtea-2.4.5/generated.build/sun/misc/Version.java
> rm -f
> /home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.01.29-18h12m38s/icedtea-2.4.5/generated.build/sun/misc/Version.java.temp
> /bin/sed -e 's/@@launcher_name@@/java/g' \
> -e 's/@@java_version@@/1.7.0_51-blfs/g' \
> -e 's/@@java_runtime_version@@/1.7.0_51-blfs-b31/g' \
> -e 's/@@jdk_derivative_name@@/IcedTea 2.4.5/g' \
> -e 's/@@distro_name@@/Linux From Scratch/g' \
> -e 's/@@distro_package_version@@/'7u51-2.4.5-blfs'/g' \
> -e 's/@@java_runtime_name@@/OpenJDK Runtime Environment/g' \
> -e 's/@@jdk_revid@@//g' \
> -e 's/@@hotspot_revid@@//g' \
> ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/Version.java.template >
> /home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.01.29-18h12m38s/icedtea-2.4.5/generated.build/sun/misc/Version.java.temp
> make[5]: Leaving directory
> `/home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.01.29-18h12m38s/icedtea-2.4.5/openjdk-boot/jdk/make/java/version'
> }}}
>
> I remember having sometime ago problems with PATH, for some packages, if
> I build as root, and for those, I have a line in the script:
>
> source /etc/profile
>
> and the PATH is well defined, because he needs:
>
> export CLASSPATH=.:/usr/share/java &&
> export PATH="$PATH:/opt/OpenJDK-1.7.0.51-bin/bin"
>
> or similar, if the binary is another one, i.e., the binary has to be in
> the path, and, in my case, it is provided by:
>
> /etc/profile.d/openjdk.sh
>
> which is defined in OJDK/Icedtea BLFS page.
>
There was a recent case - maybe also a second case with same cause - where the
user was
doing things using 'sudo' instead of root, and it broke the PATH stuff ('cos
sudo cfg
essentially reset the PATH &c). 'Bout a few weeks or so ago - sorry not more
detail.
Resolution was to do as root: iirc user hadn't got root stuff setup properly -
tho' that
was in lfs.
rgds,
akh
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
