Em 04-04-2014 06:24, Pierre Labastie escreveu: > Le 04/04/2014 11:11, Pierre Labastie a écrit : >> Le 04/04/2014 10:54, Richard Melville a écrit : >>> >>> On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 6:46:05 PM Richard Melville wrote: >>> > There's an error in the book's suggested configure commands: >>> > --libexecdir=/usr/lib/sudo should be --libexecdir=/usr/lib. >>> Both current >>> > books have this error which surely would produce "two" sudo >>> directories; >>> > one below the other. >>> > >>> > Richard >>> >>> You are incorrect there Richard. >>> >>> I have used those instructions for sudo and it does NOT as you >>> state produce >>> two sudo directories. >>> >>> >>> Maybe we are both right :-) I didn't run make && make install with >>> the book's instructions so I can't confirm that two directories *are* >>> produced. >>> >>> >>> >>> Try running ./configure --help and looking at the maintainers >>> instructions. >>> >>> Christopher >>> >>> >>> I's a fact, however, that if you run --libexecdir=/usr/lib/sudo you >>> *will* receive a warning from the configure script that reads: >>> WARNING: libexecdir should not include the "sudo" subdirectory. >>> Running --libexecdir=/usr/lib does not produce the warning, but >>> still provides the required /usr/lib/sudo. >>> >>> If, as you say, two directories *aren't* produced then the configure >>> script must be compensating for the error. However, it is *still* an >>> error and should be rectified in the book. >>> >>> >> I go have a look and correct if necessary. >> >> Pierre > Done at r12930.
My script is as the book now. I had that change to be done, probably more than one update ago, thought had done it. Perhaps it got back during the discussion about removing libexec, then not doing it for sudo. But I should have noticed it. Apologies to all. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
