> Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 12:10:35 +0100 (BST) > From: ortenzia konyha <[email protected]> > To: BLFS Support List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] lynx this client does not contain support for > https urls BLFS 7.5
> > -------------------------------------------- > > El mié, 28/5/14, akhiezer <[email protected]> escribió: > > > Asunto: Re: [blfs-support] lynx this client does not contain support > > for https urls BLFS 7.5 > > Para: "BLFS Support List" <[email protected]> > > Fecha: miércoles, 28 de mayo, 2014 11:46 > > . . > > --enable.nls\ > > > > That should be, or at least is likely better to > > be: > > > > --enable-nls > > \ > > > > Your original post iirc > > has it correct; so the '.' may be a typo that > > you're > > carrying through the posts; but > > if you're actually issuing that on the > > configure command line, then I'd guess > > you're likely to hit a bump somewhere. > > > > > > Also, just to > > be on the safe side, leave a space before the '\' > > . > > Dear akh, I am ashamed but the space before the backslas was the problem. I > am now answerin using lynx. thank you very much. Hey, that's great news! You're welcome. Glad you got it sorted. (( Btw, (usually) no need for folks to feel 'ashamed' or 'embarrassed' on such things - even allowing for perhaps language differences in the sense of 'strengths' of how the words are being used. )) > > > > > --with-ssl\ > > > > > > Again, just to be on safe side > > - especially if you're trying to debug an > > apparently-weird error - leave a space before > > the '\', thus: > > > > --with-ssl \ > > > > Yes, it "shouldn't" be needed, > > &c&c; but that's not the point here. > > . . > > > > In your email > > program, do you have an option to 'indent replies > > ...' and with > > a 'prefix' such as > > '> '? If so, I'd really recommend enabling > > those, testing > > it out so that you see how it > > works, and keeping it switched on. Otherwise, > > your successive posts in a thread become > > increasingly entagnled [sic!] with the > > contents of previous ones: which in turn makes > > it difficult for folks to > > understand - or > > indeed see what is the difference between one post and > > the > > next (like for your two posts within the > > past hour or two); and thus make > > it > > increasingly difficult for folks to try to help you. > > I noticed that your reply was indented by one space (' ') character: which certainly is an improvement; but even better, do use the two-character '> ' (without the quotes) - it makes a huge difference. Also if I may suggest: I'd recommend checking your email program's settings concerning line-length, line-wrapping, etc: your replies seem to be wrapping at approx 60 chars; whereas 80 would be a generally-better setting. rgds, akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
