On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote: > After reading that information, I looked at your original post - > the kernel failed to mount the stick.
Yet, it was not my input, but printout from the kernel (as I stated: warning message on console). I doesn't mean I want it to be mounted, but system did try. > I now think that something in > your desktop environment is telling the kernel to automount any USB > stick (or disk) which appears. But I do not know what DE you are > using, and I regard DEs which think they might know what I want to > do with a stick or disk as something to avoid. System boots in level 3, no DE, plain terminal system. > If I cared, I would also ask why two built-in disks, plus an > external drive, makes the added stick appear at /dev/sde instead of > /dev/sdd. But I don't, and your post is contradictory (booted from > internal disk, but also booted from eUSB). Sorry, I mistyped in my previous answer. System has 8 SATA disks and boots from internal USB SSD disk. Root partition is found and mounted using PARTUUID, so it can't be confused with anything else. > So, I suggest that you look at what sort of automounting your > system does, and check the details of how that is configured. I don't remember if anything is specifically configured neither in LFS not in BLFS boot for automount without installing any DE. Also while linux complained about partition 1 (type EF02), it didn't try to mount well recognized partition 2 (ext2) nor partition3 (ext4) on the same USB stick. This why I have a doubt if it is automount issue. BR Alexey -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
