Le 12/04/2015 18:36, Paul Rogers a écrit : > Installation begins with these instructions: > > "The javadoc command coming with OpenJDK 8 has become much stricter than > before regarding the conformance of the Javadoc comments in source code > to HTML. The Junit documentation does not meet those standard, so the > conformance checks have to be disabled. This can be done with the > following command: > > sed -i '\@/docs/@a<arg value="-Xdoclint:none"/>' build.xml" > > There are some possible implications, interpretations and consequences > of this incompatibility that may have some impact on my recent JDK-8 > testing. So which of these are true or false? > > 1) If one has installed Junit-4.11 earlier, perhaps using the BLFS-7.6 > JDK-1.7.0.65, everything is still fine. T|F
T (guess, not tested): the problem is with doc generation, not with package compilation. > > 2) In that case, one will no longer be able to use the documentation > for Junit. So one might as well reinstall Junit with these > instructions. T|F F (guess, not tested): if doc is already generated, it should be usable. > > 3) If one tries to use an earlier installation of Junit in JDK-8 testing > some of the tests will fail or results be invalid. T|F T: Not because of the above, but it seems that jtreg wants an earlier version of Junit (4.6 or so). So If you have 4.11, that might explain some bad results. Normally, Junit is contained in the jtreg tarball. You might want to remove any other version. > > Pierre told me he'll be offline for a week. I hope someone else knows > these answers. > Apparently, no, sorry for the delay. The doc issue has been discussed in a ticket (#5930) Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
