Paul Rogers wrote:
Building in /usr/local is not common for BLFS users, it seems a bit
too BSD-ish. And the udev variants probably assume that everything it
uses is part of /usr, even more so for udev-from-systemd.
Back when I got my 486DX33 I was hoping to run BSD-386 on it, but it
never came my way. First "real" OS I got for it was RHL-6.1 "Cartman"
from a CD in a book. I don't know what BSDs habits are. I decided to
consider LFS my "base" and whatever I choose add as "local", albeit
there are some BLFS things that have found their way into /usr. My
clone script installs LFS cleanly, then asks if the "enhancements"
should be installed. One can choose.
Your distro, your rules. Just don't expect a lot of excitement from others when
you customize.
I shall be sad when udev gets screwed into systemd so tight it cannot be
extracted. Sooner or later...
Actually I've been toying with the idea of using a custom script to make a
series of mknod commands to add things I need at boot. Then I can skip udev
completely. In the final analysis, what does it add for us? About the only
thing I can think of that affects most users is that it may change some
permissions in /dev.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
