On Sep 3, 2015 6:27 AM, "Hazel Russman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:27:08 +0200
> Simon Kitching <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've been struggling with getting wireless working recently - finally
> > working.
> >
> > One of the significant problems is that the BLFS book recommends
> > compiling wpa_supplicant with *two* back-ends enabled: "wext" and
> > "wired". Unfortunately, that means the "-D" option on the commandline is
> > mandatory; if omitted then wpa_supplicant just silently does nothing
> > (without any warning or error messages).
> >
> > And some other files, eg systemd's "wpa_supplicant.service" or dhcpcd's
> > wpa_supplicant hook-script, do not specify a -D option (presumably they
> > assume that only the wext back-end is compiled in).
> >
> > I'm surprised nobody else has had problems with this. Maybe a warning in
> > the BLFS book would be a good idea?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Simon
> > --
> I have just checked on my laptop (lfs-systemd 7.6). ps -ax|grep wpa shows
that wpa is running without the -D option. Nevertheless I am online and can
ping sites. The supplicant daemon was launched by [email protected].
There is no driver option mentioned in the wpa_supplicant.service file
either, but wpa_supplicant-wired.service does specify -Dwired. It looks
like the book has this covered.
>
> I do think though that it would be a good idea to put a line in the book
saying that you *either* use the wpa_supplicant.service with dbus (if
you're thinking of installing Network Manager later) *or* the
[email protected]. I had a lot of initial trouble getting on line
because I enabled both of them and they interfered with each other.
> --
> H Russman

Hello there,

I think I have put an adequate line in the book, in the development
version. If someone can check and tell me if it is good enough, then that
would really help me out.

Douglas R. Reno
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to