> That's not the point. The point is why use CLFS when all you need is > a minimal 32-bit version of a generally available 32-bit OS (e.g. > Debian) on the 64-bit hardware and build the 32-bit LFS from there?
I suppose so, but as it seems I've noted before, loading/customizing another OS so I could build a 32-bit LFS on my 64-bit box, maybe already with a fully comitted hard drive, isn't the path that would immediately attract me. [Not that most of us wouldn't already have one or more already at hand. ;-) ] Just sayin' that if all I had was my 64-bit system maybe a CLFS build would be the easiest way to go. I don't know how many users, besides me, characteristically partition hard drives for extra (10-15) partitions from the start. ;-) -- http://www.fastmail.com - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
