Re: [blfs-support] LVM2 with BLFS on systemd

[David Denny]

On 9/24/2017 3:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:

David Denny wrote:

Dear BLFS,

I would be grateful for feedback on other's experience setting up LVM2
based on the BLFS instructions to determine if I've goofed somewhere, or
just hit a branch not covered.


date and incrementally added a few things here and there.

BLFS development version (9/23.)
I've built, tested and installed the LVM and associated software and
configured and populated several volumes, then rebooted.
On booting, the LVM volumes do not mount as they should.  Note that my
boot / system isn't on the LVM volumes.

happened at all.  The system hangs at fstab processing and then enters
rescue state.

mount perfectly.  I can go to the multi-user state.
I was able to modify and install three of the systemd scripts that come
with LVM2 and modify one setting in lvm.conf to use lvmetad now drives
mount on boot.  I'm not sure this is all I should do, but at least the
booting issue is addressed.


boot-up, and I would be grateful to understand if other people are
successful in having LVM go online at boot or not.  If this is not

BLFS write-up, otherwise I need to go find my problem.

Here are the configuration / versions I'm working with:

  * BLFS Systemd development version, 9/22
  * systemd-234
  * BLFS systemd units, 20160602
  * LVM2-2.02.171
  * mdadm-4.0
  * blfs-systemd-unit-20160602
  * thin-provisioning from repository as of 9/22

I built my system based on LFS / BLFS.  I've kept things pretty well up to I bought some big drives and am now working to implement LVM2 based on the No errors are thrown, logs are clean.  In fact, it seems that nothing has If I manually execute "lvchange -y a" then the drives will pop online and I do not see how the current software (udev rules, systemd units) handles handled, I could offer some very simple redlines for consideration to the

  -- Bruce

I understand your problems.  The LVM2 codes is not well tested so there may be some issues.  What I would suggest as an alternative is to use btrfs instead.  It seems to be easier to use/manage than LVM2.

Thank you Bruce and Pierre!

Best regards,
David

I looked at BTRFS and from what I could find it seem it was still a little unstable. I don't need much fancy.  All my drive concatenation and RAID is done on the controller and I don't have anywhere for mirrors or snapshots. I really just want some resizable partitions for some form of data security.  LVM is currently working okay and I'll just leave it as is for now.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page