On 1.11.2017 14:16, Armin K. wrote:
On 1.11.2017 9:41, Pierre Labastie wrote:
On 28/10/2017 20:13, Riccardo G Corsi wrote:
Il 27/10/2017 21:00, [email protected]
ha scritto:
On 10/27/2017 04:09 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
Hi,
The book itself does not use Java much (fop and its deps), but I
know there
are Java users among the LFS'ers. So I'd like to ask them a
question: OpenJDK
for Java 9 has been recently released, and the question is whether
to move to
Java 9 or to keep Java 8 for the time being. I have no idea of the
differences
between Java 8 and 9 and of the difficulties to move code from 8 to
9. That's
why I ask, before applying the BLFS "update to the most recent
release"
(loose) policy.
Regards,
Pierre
Hello, I think it is better to keep Blfs up to date moving to Java 9. In
general Java is good in backward compatibility.
Riccardo
I've begun moving to JAVA 9. It seems there is an OSS JVM made
available at
http://download.java.net/java/GA/jdk9/9.0.1/binaries/openjdk-9.0.1_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz.
I think of using that for bootstrapping, instead of hosting it on
anduin. Or
maybe just using anduin for a 32-bit machine, which is not provided.
Thoughts?
Pierre
The download site listed above says that binaries for other than x64
will be available later. Until that happens, you could use ojdk8
binaries to build jdk9, don't you think? They're available for both x86
and x86_64.
http://jdk.java.net/8/
Duh, just moments after I hit sent I saw that the binaries are
pre-relase builds. Ignore the previous msg.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
