Java is out of the question. On 11/30/2017 02:00 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:36:40 -0800 > From: Paul Rogers <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] About SBUs > Message-ID: > <1511998600.3872333.1188767608.7cc3e...@webmail.messagingengine.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Ken, among the several important issues here is CPU/chipset > architecture. My infrastructure is Intel, so I can't speak to AMD. > "Hyperthreading", introduced with the later P4's, and still in the old > i7 I use, is better than not having it, but not a lot. Even with > multicore CPU's there'd be an issue of CPU scheduling at the hardware > level, dare I suggest that Intel might even be able to change that at > the microcode patch level, not to mention Linux kernel. There is still > competition for CPU/chipset/bandwidth, that'd be different for different > architectures and there's no way to predict the user's case. > > I'd go with the suggestion to note on the larger packages, those using > C++, (JAVA?), that predictions are just unreliable. (reminding me of > some primitive peoples who count: one, two, many.) > -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
