Java is out of the question.

On 11/30/2017 02:00 PM, [email protected]
wrote:


> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:36:40 -0800
> From: Paul Rogers <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] About SBUs
> Message-ID:
>       <1511998600.3872333.1188767608.7cc3e...@webmail.messagingengine.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Ken, among the several important issues here is CPU/chipset
> architecture.  My infrastructure is Intel, so I can't speak to AMD. 
> "Hyperthreading", introduced with the later P4's, and still in the old
> i7 I use, is better than not having it, but not a lot.  Even with
> multicore CPU's there'd be an issue of CPU scheduling at the hardware
> level, dare I suggest that Intel might even be able to change that at
> the microcode patch level, not to mention Linux kernel.  There is still
> competition for CPU/chipset/bandwidth, that'd be different for different
> architectures and there's no way to predict the user's case.
> 
> I'd go with the suggestion to note on the larger packages, those using
> C++, (JAVA?), that predictions are just unreliable.  (reminding me of
> some primitive peoples who count: one, two, many.)
> 
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to