Hi, Sorry, if I am asking in wrong place. I've made a little thesis about LFS 8.0. I've built a small LFS/BLFS system successfully.
To defend my thesis I have to answer a question (besides others): Before installation of *lsb_release-1.4*, there is a *sed* command what replaces "n/a" to "unavailable" in the *lsb_release* file. It says: "First fix a minor display problem:" The question is why is it problem, if I live it with "n/a" value? I have an idea that if I want to process the lsb_release output with another script the slash (/) could cause difficulties. Is this the reason that it's better if I replace the "n/a" text, or there is a more serious one? Sorry about my English, and thanks for your time, Tanyi
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
