On 01/31/2018 09:54 AM, Thomas Seeling wrote:
Hallo,
--without-ads
--without-ldap
For right now, these switches are simply not valid with current samba.
Please note that I haven't tried this, and am not suggesting that it is
a great idea to install a crippled samba, but I've recited the mantra
and did the above. :-)
I think it's simply overkill to require an LDAP server for my situation
with something like 10 users. I love the domain feature for the unified
login, I don't need anything else and for me this is nothing like
"crippled".
LFS always followed the paradigm of "only install the minimum". So for
now I'll stick to samba 4.5 as long as it is supported.
No, "only install the minimum" is a slight misconception. If that were
true, Gnome and KDE would be goners! :-) "Your distro, your rules"
allows for that interpretation, however. Short answer, if somebody tests
the patch and can verify normal functionality of simple shares (printing
would also be desirable if that's common for those two options), I'll
make it optional on the samba page in BLFS.
--DJ
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
