On 28/03/2019 20:30, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-support wrote:
> On 3/28/19 2:17 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support wrote:
>> On 28/03/2019 16:18, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-support wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/28/19 1:46 AM, Hans Malissa via blfs-support wrote:
>>>> On Mar 27, 2019, at 04:07 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-support
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> On 3/27/19 4:17 PM, Hans Malissa via blfs-support wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm installing libseccomp-2.3.3 on BLFS 8.4-systemd following the
>>>>>> instructions on
>>>>>> http://linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/stable-systemd/general/libseccomp.html.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I run the test suite, I get a strange error:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ make check
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> CC     35-sim-negative_one.o
>>>>>> CCLD   35-sim-negative_one
>>>>>> error: install "head" and include it in your $PATH
>>>>>> FAIL: regression
>>>>>> ===========
>>>>>> 1 of 1 test failed
>>>>>> ===========
>>>>>> make[2]: *** [Makefile:1005: check-TESTS] Error 1
>>>>>> make[1]: *** [Makefile:1129: check-am] Error 2
>>>>>> make: *** [Makefile:498: check-recursive] Error 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't quite understand what that means. "head" from Coreutils-8.30
>>>>>> (http://linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable-systemd/chapter06/coreutils.html)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is available and working. It is located in /bin, which is in my $PATH.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is hard to say without more information. All tests bass for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking at the code, I'll bet that you do not have 'which' installed.
>>>>
>>>> That was it, thanks a lot. After installing 'which', all tests pass.
>>>> The instructions for 'libseccomp' don't list 'which' as a dependency, 
>>>> though.
>>>>
>>>> Hans
>>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> I just added Which as a required dependency for libseccomp at r21405
>>>
>>
>> Shouldn't it be optional rather? It's for tests (I can fix the book if you
>> agree)...
> 
> I agree.
> 

Done at r21408

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to