> >
> > And actually, isn't systemd-resolved enough, and do we need bind or unbound?
>
> I'm not that familiar with systemd-resolved or unbound, but I think both are
> just dns clients similar to dhcpcd. bind has a robust server and a client.
> We provide a configuration for the bind server that allows using it as a
> local caching name server, but it can be configured as a robust internet
> name server.
>
> -- Bruce
I don't use systemd or bind, but I do use unbound. From past
comments on a FreeBSD list, I got the impression that it provides
more security - to stop spoofing or MITM redirection.
ĸen
--
It is said that there are two great unsolved problems in computer
science: naming, cache invalidation, and off-by-one errors.
-- Ben Bullock
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
