On 10/17/19 12:45 AM, EscuelitaViva via blfs-support wrote:
Hello BLFS crew,
New to the list and will be helping out as best I can to support my
favorite project, LFS.
I'm a grey beard, a throw back from the Commodore, Atari, Timex
Sinclair, Trash 80 days.
Anyone program Fortran here? Never mind ;P
Fortran II, Fortran IV, Fortran 66, or Fortran 77 ?
Seriously impressive how you all have managed to keep up with the updates!
But at the rate things are changing, not just in our field, but in the
world in general...going to need a miracle to pull off supporting the
exponential growth of these systems in the future.
Well here is another piece of the puzzle to dissect:
Bind 9.14.5 is dropping this into sys.log, but still runs fine:
named[459]: listening on IPv4 interface enp0s3, 192.168.56.2#53
named[459]: unable to set effective uid to 0: Operation not permitted
named[459]: generating session key for dynamic DNS
named[459]: unable to set effective uid to 0: Operation not permitted
named[459]: sizing zone task pool based on 2 zones
Found this link
<http://bind-users-forum.2342410.n4.nabble.com/BIND-9-14-0-unable-to-set-effective-uid-to-0-Operation-not-permitted-td6844.html>
describing named wanting to revert back to UID 0, root for some reason
even though it is in chroot at this time.
You can disable caps --disable-linux-caps but at the cost of security,
and no one knows what that cost is?!?
This page also discusses the issue:
https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/issues/1042
Anyone with some info, please let me know.
Thanks so much.
And again, what a fantastic project! Glad to be here.
bind has now released version 9.14.7, but I've not checked that yet.
See if that fixes the problem.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
