Hey guys, I wanted to run an issue I am having by you all since I haven't been able to find anything online about it.
I should start by saying that I am attempting to build a multilib (64-bit + 32-bit libraries) LFS system using the steps found here: *https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-from-scratch-13/%5Bguide%5D-howto-multilib-lfs-4175649832/* <https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-from-scratch-13/%5Bguide%5D-howto-multilib-lfs-4175649832/> So far, I have had no problems whatsoever and was successfully able to build GCC-9.2.0 with x86_64 and i386 libraries and complete the LFS portion of the build. I am now in the process of installing the BLFS packages and recently installed LLVM-8.0.1 (just the 64-bit libraries at the moment, will install 32-bit later). The build completed successfully with no errors. However, whenever I try to install packages that by default try to use clang C++ instead of GCC such as ICU-64.2, I get the following error message: *configure: error: C++ compiler clang++ does not work or no compiler found* Obviously the workaround would be to install using GCC instead, but I'm trying to get to the bottom of why LLVM doesn't seem to work or isn't found. Is there a way to run a sanity test similar to the one the LFS book has us run after installing GCC that I could perform to determine if my LLVM clang compiler actually works? Like I said, it seemed to build just fine without any errors, so if I can rule out the possibility that the compiler doesn't work I can then move on to figuring out why packages such as ICU can't find the clang++ compiler. Thanks! -- Jared
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
