> Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2019 at 10:40 PM
> From: "Pierre Labastie via blfs-support" 
> <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: "Pierre Labastie" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] is there an xt_LOG module in kernel 5.4.x?
>
> Le 14/12/2019 à 09:31, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support a écrit :
> > Le 14/12/2019 à 02:55, DJ Lucas via blfs-support a écrit :
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/13/2019 8:57 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support wrote:
> >>> Le 13/12/2019 à 15:15, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support a écrit :
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I just installed the 5.4.2 kernel, and got:
> >>>>
> >>>> modprobe: FATAL: Module xt_LOG not found in directory /lib/modules/5.4.2
> >>>>
> >>>> at boot. Note that this is not the result of having it builtin: 
> >>>> nf_conntrack
> >>>> is builtin, and there is no message about it. I think the problem is 
> >>>> rather
> >>>> that in:
> >>>> Networking support --->
> >>>>    Networking options --->
> >>>>      Network packet filtering framework (Netfilter) --->
> >>>>        Core Netfilter Configuration --->
> >>>>
> >>>> I have:
> >>>> -*- Netfilter Xtables support (required for ip_tables)
> >>>>         *** Xtables combined modules ***
> >>>>
> >>>> That is all the options under Xtable support
> >>>> (where xt_LOG resides according to help)
> >>>> are combined into one and not select-able individually (automatically
> >>>> selected). But while for example xt_NFLOG (another module associated to 
> >>>> an
> >>>> option under the same hierarchy) appears in the builtin modules, xt_LOG 
> >>>> does
> >>>> not...
> >>>>
> >>>> I've not investigated more, because I do not know anything about this
> >>>> netfilter stuff... But I wanted to let you know
> >>>>
> >>> Well, it seems you need to tick "Advanced netfilter configuration", under
> >>> Network packet filtering framework (Netfilter) --->
> >>> to get access to the individual Xtables modules.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Then this should be added to the book I think. Thanks for double checking 
> >> it.
> >> I'm studying for a vendor test right now, but will get to it in a couple 
> >> of days.
> >>
> > 
> > Note that "make defconfig" adds all the Xtable options as modules [m]. But I
> > had a config from previous builds, and somehow, it did not have xt_LOG 
> > ticked
> > (while it had xt_NFLOG, but it is the result of many runs of "make 
> > oldconfig"
> > for each new kernel, and I guess I've missed a "no" answer to this one, or
> > something like that.): since it is the config for VMs, which are on a host,
> > which is itself behind a router (provided by the ISP), I thought I did not
> > need iptables, but now it is recommended for something, so I have to set it 
> > up.
> 
> Hmmm, it's been recommended by NetworkManager for years. It's just that the
> recent changes in iptables have unveiled this misconfiguration.
> 
> > 
> > Anyway, I'll try to document this in the book today.
> > 
> 
> Done at 22470. I've given the configuration for running the personal firewall
> only. Hope it is OK.
> 
> Pierre
> -- 
> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> 

Hello,

This has got me curious about something.  I absolutely hate changing anything 
in the kernel unless it is absolutely essential.  I perfected the kernel to my 
liking and specific to my hardware when I first started using linuxfromscratch, 
and only tweaked it when I moved from a laptop to a desktop.

That is until recently when I moved everything to use lvm2.  I always used the 
make oldconfig after copying the config file from /boot into the new kernel 
tree and renaming it to .config.  But when I moved to lvm2, I did make (after 
moving a tweaked config to .config) instead, and that showed new options and 
brought up the y/n questions.  Is there any harm in doing this, or have the 
kernel developers changed something, or have I just been lucky?

Regards,

Christopher.
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to