On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 04:49:31PM -0500, Joe Locash wrote: > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021, 1:24 PM Ken Moffat via blfs-support < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:40:08AM -0500, Pat Barnes via > > blfs-support wrote: > > > > > > On 3/5/21 2:54 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-support wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 12:32:05PM -0500, Pat Barnes via > > > > blfs-support wrote: > > > > > While installing LLVM in 10.1, I found that Clang now has a > > > > > dependency on GIT. This should be added to the list of > > > > > dependencies for LLVM, at least when Clang is also installed. > > > > > > > > > > Pat > > > > > [...] > > > > > > Yes, my build failed until I installed GIT and then it installed > > > correctly without any problem. The failure occurred after LLVM > > > proper had compiled and the checks for CLANG dependencies egan. > > > > > > Pat > > > > > Thanks for the report. I've moved git to a required dependency in > > the dev books at r24349 and created errata entries for 10.1 and > > 10.1-systemd. > > > > I'm not so sure this should be a required dep. I build llvm very early > with clang and without git installed and don't get a failure. My build box > doesn't have net access either. I don't run the checks so it could be that > git is needed for that. > Thanks to both you and Pierre for querying this. I've now tested building llvm with clang on a machine where /usr/bin/git has been made unavailable: the build, a DESTDIR install and the tests all completed.
I've reverted the change in r24349 and the errata. ĸen -- RIGHT, he said, PESTILENCE, OPEN ANOTHER PACK OF CARDS. I'M GOING TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS IF IT KILLS ME, FIGURATIVELY SPEAKING OF COURSE. Rincewind grabbed Twoflower and pulled. -- The Light Fantastic -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
