As far back as I can remember, Microsoft has always understated disk
fragmentation. I use a third party program as well and it does a much
better job.
Dan
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Gerald Levy" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 3:22 PM
To: "blind-computing" <[email protected]>
Subject: [Blind-Computing] Disk Defragging
Happy holidays, fellow listers. I have a question about defragging the C
drive in my Dell workstation. Today, for the first time, I used Auslogics
Disk Defrag, and the result was that more than 6200 files were fragmented.
In all my previous defrags using the built-in Windows XP Disk
Defragmentation utility , no more than 10 fragmented files were ever
detected. How can there be such a discrepancy in results between
Auslogics Disk Defrag and the Windows Defrag utility? It seems to me that
a file is either fragmented or it isn't, so how could one utility find so
many more fragmented files than the other? Thanks for any explanations.
Gerald
For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
