The reason behind all of the flame-ups has been traced back to the 
lithium-ion
batteries
commonly used in products like
laptop computers,
cell phones
and, yes,
iPods.
Sony has
recalled
around 10 million of their batteries at a cost to the company of more than 
$400 million. Apple hasn't confirmed that the source of Danny Williams' iPod
Nano fire was the battery, but the Nanos do use lithium-ion batteries.

So what's the problem with the batteries? Do they run on
gasoline?

ion batteries as potentially hazardous is not new. So why do consumer 
electronic companies
use them?

The answer is because the batteries give a lot of bang for the buck. They 
can hold up to six times the charge of a regular lead-acid battery (like the 
kind
used in a
car)
for the same amount of battery weight, which makes them very valuable for 
making mobile devices like cell phones and laptops lighter. They are also 
rechargeable.
The problem with lithium-ion batteries is that they degrade over the course 
of a few years. As the batteries degrade, the
lithium
and carbon that create the charge also degrade, and impurities form.

Sony says that the battery fires are caused by microscopic metal particles 
that come in contact with the other parts of the battery cell, causing a 
short
circuit. The company says that on most occasions, the battery will shut down 
when a short circuit occurs. In some instances, however, the short circuit
will cause an overheating of the battery cell, which could then erupt in 
flames [source:
Sony].

Flaming consumer products add up to more than just threatened lives,
lawsuits,
recalls and lost revenue. It also further illuminates a painful fact that is 
well-known in the tech industry: Battery technology has not been able to 
keep
up with the rapid progress of consumer electronics. As iPods get smaller, 
laptops get lighter, and cell phones get slimmer, the designs of these 
products
are still held back by the bulky -- and, at times, dangerous -- batteries 
they use. This puts the tech industry in a catch-22: We live in an 
increasingly
wireless world. Companies that produce wireless devices are forced to use 
batteries, and currently the best batteries for mobile devices are 
lithium-ion.

This catch-22 has spurred vigorous research into finding an improved battery 
technology. It has become a Holy Grail of power supply research in recent 
years.
The company that can manufacture a lighter, safer, longer-lasting battery 
could take over the lion's share of the market. This is no secret, and many 
groups
are competing to find a way to break through the battery barrier.
Battery Breakthroughs?

In the search for a better
battery,
researchers are trying everything they can think of. One team of researchers 
at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is looking at
capacitors,
a type of electricity generator that dates back 300 years. Capacitors don't 
store as much of a charge as batteries, but they can be recharged in a few 
seconds,
as opposed to the hours it takes rechargeable batteries to power up. 
Capacitors can also be recharged hundreds of thousands of times, which 
vastly extends
their life over lithium-ion batteries.

The reason capacitors have fallen out of use is that they require a large 
surface area to power a device such as a
laptop.
The MIT researchers have gotten around this by applying
nanotechnology
to the capacitor. Nanotechnology uses incredibly small materials -- the MIT 
scientists are using nanotubes, which are 30,000 times thinner than a human
hair [source:
Science Central].

By expanding the amount of matter within the capacitor surface on a 
nanoscale, the researchers were able to give the capacitor the power 
required by mobile
devices and
electric cars,
while reducing the surface area needed to generate the electricity.

MIT isn't the only institution taking another look at the capacitor. A team 
at LG Chemicals has created a hybrid of rechargeable battery and capacitor 
that
is lightweight and biodegradable. The battery can store energy, and the 
capacitor releases that energy safely in large, predictable amounts. But the 
plastic
battery is still under research, and in its current form won't make it to 
the market -- it can only hold about the same charge as a traditional 
alkaline
battery, like the ones that power your point-and-shoot digital camera.

The LG battery does have an extra bonus in addition to its biodegradable 
property. It can be molded into any shape, which means that mobile device 
designers
would no longer have to create a product based first on the size and shape 
of the battery it uses [source:
Brown Daily Herald].

Shewanella onedidensis
Image courtesy
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

World, meet Shewanella oneidensis,
possibly­ your next battery.

Batteries of all stripes traditionally rely on chemicals to create their 
charge. But research into a new type of battery uses more organic 
substances. In
2006, the
U.S. Air Force
granted $4.5 million to a University of Southern California-based research 
team to continue its investigation into using microbes as a power source. In
the late 1980s, researchers discovered that the Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 
bacteria naturally generates electricity, and since then, science has been 
searching
for a way to harness its power and apply it to practical applications. The 
USC researchers have created a microbial
fuel cell
using the MR-1, but it's only been able to produce a weak current so far. 
The Air Force funding should help ensure that the researchers will continue 
their
investigation, however [source:
Physorg.com].

Regardless of what technology is employed in the battery of the future, it 
must possess at least three properties: It must be lightweight, it must be 
long-lasting,
and -- perhaps most importantly -- it must not catch fire.

Reply via email to