They both have there place.  These are just my experiences with them.  the
oiless is much noisier, and takes longer to fill up.  the piston rings in an
oiless are Teflon coated, and are supposed to be replaced every so often,
not sure how often.  The oiless works better in an unheated shop, and every
oiless I have seen does not have a belt to worry about .
The oiled seems to be quieter, and fills up quicker.  In cold weather it
does not work very well until the oil gets warmed up.  I have had to help
mine along for a while.  There is a belt usually, that you need to check
every so often.  I only use air tools, so I am not sure about how much oil
blows by the pistons to get in the air, but I wouldn't think very much at
all, unless the rings are warn.
Michael

 
  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dale Leavens
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 21:56
To: [email protected]
Subject: [BlindHandyMan] Oil lubricated vs oilless compressors



My son does some air brushing. He has been using one of those little
diaphragm continuous compressors. you can about feel the ;pulses as the
machine works. I thought maybe a compressor might be a welcome Christmas
present.

Now I have a pretty substantial oilless compressor which I don't work all
that hard and I rather appreciate not having to take much care of it. I see
though a lot of oil lubricated compressors and about the only thing they
seem to claim for them is long life but never with any facts or figures.

Do any of you know if and how much better these might be and if any of that
oil becomes atomized into the air stream?

Now air brushing doesn't require a large volume or very high pressure but I
figure a small tank reservoir should deliver more even and predictable
pressure.

Thanks.

Dale Leavens, Cochrane Ontario Canada
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:DLeavens%40puc.net> net
Skype DaleLeavens
Come and meet Aurora, Nakita and Nanook at our polar bear habitat.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to