running cordless, or separate is simplest with the least worries.
Now, go wireless keyboard and you can sit on your favorite chair and 
compute away any media.


On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Roger Bachelder wrote:

> Hello Spiro,
>
> This is most likely what i will do. Unless i can save on some nice cordless
> speakers.
> Thank you for the information.
>
> Take care,
>
>
> Roger C Bachelder 3rd
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>  _____
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 6:15 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Speaker wiring
>
>
>
> You know you could do this with any 3 position switch.
> Attach the pos of the receiver to #1, both grounds to the speaker and
> the computer amp output to #2.
> But the signal out of the computer area must be amplified. Where is the
> computer signal getting it's juice? Easiest would be if you had a separate
> tiny amp, like some sonic impact tri-path jobby, separate for that signal.
> Pick a tiny amp as the back channels are getting low power and you don't
> want to have to hook up a vol control as well,.
>
> Once that is done, you can find a switch box on the market if you
> don't want to rig one.
> this is a common device called a speaker selecter.
> It's made for the opposite direction, but can work for this just fine.
> They are made to take a single input and send it to multiple speakers one
> or two at a time.
> If there are no powered devices in it, it is totally passive, you can wire
> it backwards.
> Instead of putting multiple speaker taps on it, you will put the multiple
> inputs on it.
> Instead of it having one input, it will have one speaker. It is a very
> simple reversal.
> This reversal may make a unit with a built in passive vol control a bit
> tricky, so stay away from that set of necessities.
>
> Do not! pick one that will allow for "both" if you want to be really safe.
> Not knowing the rest of your system, amp selections, power supplies,
> S.E.T. transformerless, push pull or whatever, you do not want to blend
> the backsignal of the main system with the signal from the computer amp.
> They might not blend well and the weaker, or least electronically safe
> will not take it well in some cases.
> So go for a simple a/b speaker switcher not a fancier
> a/b/a-b.
> An a/b/c is okay too.
> This is why you want a 3 position light switch in the rigged version,
> So that it is an "on off on" type configuration.
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Roger Bachelder wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I'm trying to figure out how to configure what seems to be a simple task.
>> I've been working on the entertainment center the last few weeks. February
>> 17 is coming up really quick, And Daytona is screaming race day scanner.
> So
>> here goes. I have my computer in a different room in which the
> entertainment
>> center is in. I would like to customize the wiring. When sitting in the
>> room, i want to make the rear speakers able to receive signals from two
>> different sources, but one at a time. Example, I would like to run a
> speaker
>> wire from my computer to the rear of the room. Then i would do the same
> and
>> run speaker wires from the receivers, rear right and left surround sound
>> speakers. to the same point in the rear of the room. Now i would like to
> buy
>> some kind of adapter / converter in which i can switch from source to
>> source. Two sources controlled by a simple switch . I figure that i can
> put
>> Daytona on through the receiver to the Bose 901 speakers. I would then
>> switch the receiver to 2 channel. Now i would switch the adapter from TV
> to
>> Computer and now the rear speakers would get NASCAR Race day scanner.
>> Can someone tell me What some thing like this would be called and where i
>> could pick one of these nifty little gadgets up ?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Take care yawl.
>>
>> Roger C Bachelder 3rd
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:Bachelder3%40verizon.net> net
>>
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

Reply via email to