so apart from quiarter running and keeping dust alagys at bay what other 
advantages are thair in sutch a system?

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Don 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:01 PM
  Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Re: central vacuum system


  Yeah, that is a problem, you would not think about happening. 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Victor Gouveia 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 8:22 AM
  Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Re: central vacuum system

  Hi All,

  I work in a home with such a system, and I have found one important, but 
  otherwise trivial problem that one might not look for.

  The outlets where you connect the vacuum hose.

  In the one house I work in, if you place repeated pressure on the outlet, 
  meaning if you pull too much on the hose, since the hose has little give in 
  terms of stretching capability, it can, and in my case, did pull out the 
  outlet to the point where the wires were hanging out of the wall, and the 
  outlet housing was stuck to the hose end.

  You might be wondering how and why the outlet came along with the hose end 
  when it was pulled, and/or why the hose simply didn't come off the wall 
  outlet when the hose was pulled. Well, the simple explanation is that the 
  outlet looks like a pet door on a regular home door.

  It consists of a flap that covers the outlet when not in use.

  This flap has a lip that slides over the end of the hose when it is 
  connected to the outlet, not allowing it to come off so easily.

  I guess this is done as a safety precaution, and as a feature, as those 
  hoses would come off quite easily given the pressure with which you apply it 
  when vacuuming.

  The owner has had to replace several outlets because of this, and, as you 
  can imagine, it's not easy to do with wires connecting the outlet to the 
  hose.

  Just something to think about in terms of future maintenance on such units.

  Victor Gouveia 

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to