This story came over my fun with tubes list but I think it is a good 
cautionary tail for handy men and women.

Regards.

Max.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "charlesallisonknouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 4:30 AM
Subject: [funwithtubes] Re: just for the fun of it - times you almost died


> I was working as a carpenter, and was cutting wood standing on a wet
> concrete pad, behind a partially built house, with mud all around, it
> recently having rained cats and dogs for days. Someone had replaced
> the power cord to the circular saw I was using with a piece of 16/2
> Romex.
>
> As my arm swung back after cutting a two-by, the romex got caught in
> the blade. The blade jammed, and did not cut the romex, but did bite
> through the insulation sufficiently that the entire circular saw,
> which was metal framed, became live. As I was not only standing on wet
> concrete but had on thoroughly soaked leather boots, the current went
> right up my arm, down my body, and out through both legs. I
> convulsively jerked - and went air-borne. In the air, I was no longer
> being shocked, but I found I could not get my hand to let go of the
> saw fast enough to avoid coming down, hitting the concrete, and
> getting shocked all over again. This turned into a fun game. After
> several bunny hops into the air - I think I also yelled, in any case
> everyone in sight was at this point watching and, I'm sure, not at all
> sure how to help - I figured out that if I managed to control the hop
> well enough I could hop backwards a little bit at a time to get off
> the pad - which I did. Finally, after what seemed rather like a
> hopping marathon, I reached the edge of the pad. Luckily the mud was a
> good six inches lower than the pad, so my final frantic leap in the
> air gave me just enough time to let go of the saw and fling it from me
> before I landed on my butt in the mud. At which point I got a rousing
> cheer and applause from all the other guys. Fat lot of help they
> were!!!
>
> best, charles

Reply via email to