Why not use rechargeable batteries n the beepers?  

... 73 ... KD5QHH ...  Jimmy ...
http://www.podsim.us
MSN or windows live... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype, jimmy.podsim ...blind people please note the period between the names.
Have a great day!


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Chanting Monks 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 12:15 PM
  Subject: [BlindHandyMan] Things that beep?


  Hi folks,

  Just had my yard fenced in and have been looking for a solution to this 
  issue. I want to jog around the inner perimeter of the yard, without having 
  to use the cane or run along the fence within touching distance. My 
  solution? Finding a way to have all four corner posts rigged with sound so 
  as I approach, I know whereabouts I'm at. Running speakers out there for 
  music would require a couple of hundred bucks to run the electric, speaker 
  wire, and then the speakers themselves, so I was looking around online for 
  beeping devices that I might simply velcro to the four fence posts and be 
  guided that way. To date, all I've found is a $30 per beeper solution from 
  MaxiAids, that uses nonrechargeable batteries, two of each, which get pricey 
  when talking about replacement. (It'd actually be cheaper for me to buy a 
  few of these beeping foam balls for kids, taking out those beepers and using 
  them, but I still wind up with the expense of pricey batteries. I'll 
  eventually run the speakers, both for my jogging and the addition to the 
  yard for BBQs, etc., so spending $120 on a short-term solution isn't in the 
  cards. Suggestions? Anybody using anything that beeps that uses traditional 
  batteries for which my charger will work? Another solution entirely, 
  perhaps? (I thought about driving a stake into the center of the yard and 
  using a rope, but I have a tree in the way that can't be removed at present 
  due to town ordinance, otherwise I'd just do the circles. Any 
  thoughts/tips/ideas would be greatly appreciated.

  Best,
  Joe 



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to