I like the higher rpm of the bigger ones for some sanding or abrasion 
jobs.





On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Bob Kennedy wrote:

> Well as my wife says, bigger is better.  Wonder if she's talking about a 
> drill press though...
>
> I'd say either would do you well for woodworking.  I like the bigger one 
> because I do a lot of work with steel and I can stall a lesser powered motor.
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Dan Rossi
>  To: [email protected]
>  Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 9:58 PM
>  Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Drill press advice.
>
>
>  Sorry, I sent the previous message before I was done. I am comparing two
>  Grizzly presses.
>
>  The Grizzly G7944
>  Motor: 3/4 H.P., single-phase, 110V
>  Overall height: 64"
>  Spindle travel: 3-1/4"
>  Number of speeds: 12
>  Drill chuck: 1/8"-5/8"
>  Spindle taper: MT #2
>  Range of speeds: 140, 260, 320, 380, 480, 540, 980, 1160, 1510, 1650,
>  2180, 3050 RPM
>  Swing: 14"
>  Drilling capacity: 3/4" steel
>  Table: Precision ground cast iron
>  Table size: 11-3/8" sq.
>  Table swing: 360
>  Table tilts: 90 in both directions
>  Approx. shipping weight: 172 lbs.
>
>  Grizzly G7947
>  Motor size: 1 H.P., Single-Phase, 110V/220V
>  Overall height: 64-1/2"
>  Swing: 17"
>  Spindle travel: 4-3/4"
>  Number of speeds: 12
>  Drill chuck: 5/8"
>  Spindle taper: MT #3
>  Range of speeds: 210, 310, 400, 440, 630, 670, 1260, 1430, 1650, 2050,
>  2350, 3300 RPM
>  Drilling capacity: 1" steel
>  Table: Precision ground cast iron
>  Table size: 13-5/8" sq.
>  Table tilts: 90 in both directions
>  Approx. shipping weight: 275 lbs.
>
>  Am I just being Tim the Tool Man Taylor by looking at the larger drill
>  press? Do I really need that much machine? The one thing that really
>  makes me like it is the additional spindle travel, 3 and a quarter verses
>  4 and 3 quarters. Plus some additional throat depth and a little more
>  power. But will I really need that?
>
>  --
>  Blue skies.
>  Dan Rossi
>  Carnegie Mellon University.
>  E-Mail: [email protected]
>  Tel: (412) 268-9081
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

Reply via email to