If I have to pay that much for one, I'd go with the Stabila.  Their 24 inch 
would run about that much and a little more for the 48 inch one I have.  It 
works great and you can turn the sound on or off in case you have help.  
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jim King 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 10:57 PM
  Subject: RE: [BlindHandyMan] Best, cheap, Audible level?





  Hello,

  The best is not cheap. If you are looking for a good level, get a spirit
  level they come from RNIB. You can probably get one from Independent Living
  Aids. I have one I bought over ten years ago and it is just as plumb as the
  day I got it. It is very rugged and precise.. and is 24 inches long. It
  will set you back about 129 or more but is worth every bit of it if you need
  quality tools.

  _____ 

  From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
  On Behalf Of Bob Kennedy
  Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 2:10 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Best, cheap, Audible level?

  Best and cheap don't really go together. Probably the best you can buy for
  not much is the one from MaxiAids. It may well be the Zircon, they won't
  say. If that is the most you can afford, you can do ok by getting one and
  attaching it to a regular 4 foot model. The one from MaxiAids is only about
  10 inches long. When I got mine, I used zip ties to attach it to my larger
  level. 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Keith Patterson 
  To: Blind HandyMan 
  Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 9:06 AM
  Subject: [BlindHandyMan] Best, cheap, Audible level?

  Any one got an idea on the Best, cheap, Audible level?
  Sorry if this has been covered before, I kind of just linger in the back
  ground and don't get to all the threads on this list.

  Keith Patterson
  kpatt...@tampabay. <mailto:KPatter2%40TampaBay.RR.Com> RR.Com

  Where am I to go, when I have gone to far?

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to