Ah thanks for the info. I know the price is right and considering how  
old my RS unit is, I think getting one of these would make sense.
On May 31, 2009, at 6:12 PM, Gerry Leary wrote:

>
>
> It is easier to understand, but it smells horrible for the first few  
> days. I also think that it does more, and sighted people say it has  
> lighted test leads.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Scott Howell
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 3:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Talking Digital Multimeter
>
> Just curious, does the new model do more than the old Radio Shack
> unit? I have one of the RS units around here, but can't recall all it
> does and I've been considering one of these other units.
>
> tnx,
> On May 31, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Bob Kennedy wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I have one and it's a good deal. The female voice is easy to
> > understand as well.
> >
> > I still have my original talking multimeter from Radio Shack I got
> > around 92 or so and I gave $100 for it.
> >
> > I also got my latest one from the same place you are asking about
> > and they are good people to deal with. I never had a problem with
> > them or the tool.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Betsy Whitney
> > To: blindhandyman-yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:05 PM
> > Subject: [BlindHandyMan] Talking Digital Multimeter
> >
> > >I saw this item and wondered if anyone had any experience with  
> it. I
> > >also want to know if the price is reasonable.
> > >Marlin P. Jones and Associates has a Talking Digital Multimeter for
> > $39.95.
> > >It measures voltage and current and speaks the results. Two AA
> > >batteries are required.
> > Thanks, Betsy
> >
> > Teamwork: Together we achieve the extraordinary.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to