Well,
put me down for both if the price is at all reasonable. I sure would 
like a better tape measure.
Max.
Dale Leavens wrote:
> OK Tom,
>
> Why don't we attack this problem?
>
> Is the sprocket method really the most reliable means of indexing a digital 
> tape measure? How about a LED and photo sensor, count the flashes.
>
> Now there must be a number of talking chips particularly with limited 
> vocabulary. I have a very old Sharp calculator which has a wonderful voice 
> and when it gets weak or under some other conditions it speaks all sorts of 
> things the calculator never says including some interesting musical sounds. 
> It has to be over 25 years old. Anyway, do we have any idea how much that 
> sort of technology would cost in lots of say a hundred?
>
> I would bet there are digital tape measures out there who's manufacturer 
> would sell us their components at reasonable price if for no other reason 
> just the possible public relations value.
>
> There has to be a way of building talking tape measures more robustly than we 
> presently have.
>
> Similarly, versatile audible levels. I was watching a chap on television 
> yesterday. He was developing a scale model of a personal flying vehicle with 
> something close to vertical take off and land. This is apparently a huge 
> control issue however his solution was twin propellers mounted to be able to 
> swing out toward the ends of the wings using the gyro effect to bring the 
> nose up or down. For control he had some sort of sensor which adjusted the 
> speed of each propeller according to the horizontal position of the wing. It 
> was cool watching him hold the plane and swing it to one side or the other 
> and hear the motors immediately change pitch. Presumably a similar sensing 
> device could be easily integrated into a leveling measure.
>
> Do you think it would be practical to develop reliable equipment with 
> off-the-shelf technology at reasonable cost? I understand that production 
> quantities would present other cost considerations but there may be 
> alternatives there too if one doesn't need to make a living from it.
>
>
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Tom Fowle 
>   To: blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com 
>   Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:34 AM
>   Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Talking tape measures
>
>
>     
>   Eric
>   We bought one at work in hopes it would do better than the Cobolt.
>   the technology used to keep track of the tape seems identical in both.
>   The voice is a lower quality than the cobolt but very similar.
>   the function of buttons is different but not dramatically so.
>
>   It uses 2 AA cells rather than the 9 volt of the cobolt.
>
>   I see no reason to spend the extra money.
>
>   tom Fowle
>
>   On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 06:52:28AM -0500, Eric wrote:
>   > Hello all. Previously there was alot of discussion on the vox talking 
> tape measure and the cobalt talking tape measure. It seems most of us had the 
> cobalt and was dissatisfied with it. My question is have any of you bit the 
> bullet and bought one of the vox ones made by Bosh, and if so, how is it 
> compared to the cobalt one? Thanks.
>   > 
>   > Eric
>   > 
>   > 
>   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   > 
>
>
>   
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Send any questions regarding list management to:
> blindhandyman-ow...@yahoogroups.com
> To listen to the show archives go to link
> http://www.acbradio.org/pweb/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=33&MMN_position=47:29
> Or
> ftp://ftp.acbradio.org/acbradio-archives/handyman/
>
> The Pod Cast address for the Blind Handy Man Show is.
> http://www.acbradio.org/news/xml/podcast.php?pgm=saturday
>
> Visit The Blind Handy Man Files Page To Review Contributions From Various 
> List Members At The Following address:
> http://www.jaws-users.com/JAWS/handyman/
>
> Visit the archives page at the following address
> http://www.mail-archive.com/blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com/  
>
> If you would like to join the JAWS Users List, then visit the following 
> address for more information:
> http://www.jaws-users.com/
> For a complete list of email commands pertaining to the Blind Handy Man list 
> just send a blank message to:
> blindhandyman-h...@yahoogroups.comyahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>   

Reply via email to