LGTM3

On Thursday, August 19, 2021 at 12:15:27 PM UTC-7 Chris Harrelson wrote:

> LGTM2
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:14 PM Mike West <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> LGTM1.
>>
>> Removing the `-webkit-` prefix seems quite reasonable to align with 
>> Firefox, and the conversation around the preview vs. filled states seems to 
>> be dealt with in the subsequent intent in 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/rCq-89BfJs0/m/xgQ967CVAQAJ
>> .
>>
>> -mike
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 9:17 PM Alex Russell <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> As it feels like this has been blocked for a while on us, I'm adding the 
>>> //components/autofill/OWNERS here to make sure they're OK w/ this moving 
>>> forward. Have also requested tests for the CL you mentioned, Jaeyong.
>>>
>>> Thanks for following up.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 12:23:53 PM UTC-7 Jaeyong Bae wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello, Alex.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the delayed updates. 
>>>> The patches needed for this are currently under review[1].
>>>> Now proceed with the request again.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3034804
>>>>
>>>> Jaeyong
>>>>
>>>> 2021년 8월 6일 (금) 오전 4:14, Alex Russell <[email protected]>님이 작성:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey Jaeyong,
>>>>>
>>>>> Wanted to make sure you aren't blocked here. Do you have updates, or 
>>>>> are you looking for the OWNERs to assist here?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 7:59:41 AM UTC-7 Jaeyong Bae wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the check. Mike.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll reactivate it as soon as I can :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2021년 7월 15일 (목) 오후 4:38, Mike West <[email protected]>님이 작성:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rego noted that WebKit landed the unprefixed pseudo-class in 
>>>>>>> https://commits.webkit.org/239313@main. From my perspective, that's 
>>>>>>> a pretty clear signal that we should do the same since Chromium is now 
>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>> odd one out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It looks to me as though there's agreement on a path forward in 
>>>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=951476, but I 
>>>>>>> haven't seen movement in the last ~3 weeks. Is this intent still 
>>>>>>> active? If 
>>>>>>> not, perhaps we could reactivate it? :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -mike
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 8:18 PM Mike West <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello, Jaeyong!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I missed the autofill team's response earlier in the week: it was 
>>>>>>>> posted at 
>>>>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=951476#c6, 
>>>>>>>> and I'd suggest that engaging there would be useful. In particular, it 
>>>>>>>> would be helpful to understand our existing behavior vis a vis the 
>>>>>>>> "preview" mode for autofill, and to figure out together how to make 
>>>>>>>> sure it 
>>>>>>>> doesn't leak data prior to user interaction.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -mike
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 9:46 PM Mike West <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -mike
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 11:33 AM Manuel Rego Casasnovas <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 31/05/2021 16:09, Jaeyong Bae wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> > *Contact emails
>>>>>>>>>> > *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> > 
>>>>>>>>>> > *Feature summary
>>>>>>>>>> > *The :autofill pseudo-classes must match input elements which 
>>>>>>>>>> have been
>>>>>>>>>> > autofilled by user agent. These pseudo-classes must stop 
>>>>>>>>>> matching if the
>>>>>>>>>> > user edits the autofilled field.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for working on this, it's always nice to get rid of 
>>>>>>>>>> -webkit-
>>>>>>>>>> prefixed properties and support the standard ones.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > *Tracking bug URL*
>>>>>>>>>> > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1164311
>>>>>>>>>> > <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1164311>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It looks we don't have any way to measure the usage of this
>>>>>>>>>> pseudo-class, it'd be nice to add a use counter for it (see the
>>>>>>>>>> Measurement field in chromestatus: "It's important to measure the
>>>>>>>>>> adoption and success of web-exposed features. Note here what
>>>>>>>>>> measurements you have added to track the success of this feature, 
>>>>>>>>>> such
>>>>>>>>>> as a link to the UseCounter(s) you have set up.").
>>>>>>>>>> Even we could have different counters for the prefixed vs 
>>>>>>>>>> unprefixed
>>>>>>>>>> pseudos.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > *Spec link
>>>>>>>>>> > *
>>>>>>>>>> https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/semantics-other.html#selector-autofill
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Some privacy concerns have been raised at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5775#issuecomment-755793947
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>> Has that been discussed further? Does it apply to Chromium 
>>>>>>>>>> implementation?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've shared this with Chrome's autofill team, and I'll share 
>>>>>>>>> whatever feedback I receive.
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > Safari: Implemented with the vendor prefix: -webkit-
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Could you notify on webkit-dev, so they might also get the chance 
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> support the unprefixed pseudo? (see https://bit.ly/blink-signals
>>>>>>>>>> ).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > Web developers: Positive
>>>>>>>>>> > (https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5775
>>>>>>>>>> > <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5775>)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why this means that developer signals are positive?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > *Is this feature fully tested in Web Platform Tests?
>>>>>>>>>> > *Yes.
>>>>>>>>>> > 
>>>>>>>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/html/semantics/selectors/pseudo-classes/autofill.html
>>>>>>>>>> > <
>>>>>>>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/html/semantics/selectors/pseudo-classes/autofill.html
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That test alone is not testing very much, but it looks like sadly 
>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>> lack support in WPT to test more things:
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/27118
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>   Rego
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/dd4568ad-b957-df04-f422-45bc2fb13ae5%40igalia.com
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXHy%3Dfxzq0mHDnmB4YNrMjH0iRJZ1sAH9Esx-VbTCCxW8u0Nw%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXHy%3Dfxzq0mHDnmB4YNrMjH0iRJZ1sAH9Esx-VbTCCxW8u0Nw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/92bac999-b689-4911-8edd-aba654046720n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to