If the current status quo is that OTs are exposed on older milestones 
during the time they are enabled (e.g. for users that haven't updated their 
browser), then from my perspective, the break in the OT's availability 
should not change that. (I think that's the case ATM, but not sure).
If it isn't the case, changing it merits a broader discussion.

On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 11:14:13 AM UTC+2 Elad Alon wrote:

> After the break. If code could work not only for m96-m99, but rather for 
> m92-m99, during the calendar time of m96-m99, that would be nice. But it's 
> not critical. I am just thinking that the OT process is probably intended 
> to look more at time than actual milestones, so possibly we could tweak the 
> rules to reflect that? But this might be a larger discussion to be had 
> elsewhere, and not specifically to this feature. Up to you!
>
> On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 8:39:52 AM UTC+1 yoav...@chromium.org 
> wrote:
>
>> LGTM to break the experiment 2021-11-08 to 2021-11-28 (I'm guessing it's 
>> to late to aim for the 1st, apologies for not responding earlier).
>> Also LGTM to experiment for 4 milestones after that, till M99, inclusive.
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 11:38:49 PM UTC+3 Elad Alon wrote:
>>
>>> If 2021-11-01 is too short-notice by now, we could also do 2021-08 to 
>>> 2021-11-28.
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, October 27, 2021 at 4:08:38 PM UTC+2 Elad Alon wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you, Yoav, for this suggestion about resetting the clock. We 
>>>> would like to now do just that, pausing the experiment 2021-11-01 to 
>>>> 2021-11-21, and restarting it again on 2021-11-22. We would like to 
>>>> experiment for 4 milestones (96 to 99, inclusive). However, if it's 
>>>> possible to also have the experiment active for older milestones during 
>>>> this time, that would be nice, too.
>>>>
>>>
>> Can you clarify what you mean by "during this time"? During the break, or 
>> after it?
>>  
>>
>>>
>>>> On Friday, August 20, 2021 at 6:44:10 AM UTC+2 yoav...@chromium.org 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> LGTM to continue experimenting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that it might be worthwhile to stop the experiment at some point, 
>>>>> as that could "reset the clock" in terms of burn-in risk, and enable an 
>>>>> overall longer experimentation period.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 3:41:14 PM UTC+2 Elad Alon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, Yoav.
>>>>>> Yes, I intend to formally reach out to Mozilla and Apple soon.
>>>>>> Agreed about strong positive signals from developers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 10:56:26 AM UTC+2 yoav...@chromium.org 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 11:42 PM 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev <
>>>>>>> blin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Contact emailselad...@chromium.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Explainerhttps://github.com/WICG/capture-handle/blob/main/README.md
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Specificationhttps://wicg.github.io/capture-handle/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Summary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We introduce a mechanism that allows an application to opt-in to 
>>>>>>>> exposing certain information to other applications which are 
>>>>>>>> video-capturing it. This allows collaboration between capturing and 
>>>>>>>> captured applications. For example, a VC application that's 
>>>>>>>> video-capturing 
>>>>>>>> a tab where a presentation application lives, could expose user-facing 
>>>>>>>> controls in the VC tab for navigating the presentation in the captured 
>>>>>>>> tab. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Blink componentBlink>GetUserMedia>Tab 
>>>>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EGetUserMedia%3ETab>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TAG reviewhttps://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/645
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TAG review statusPending
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Risks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gecko: No signal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WebKit: No signal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have we reached out? https://bit.ly/blink-signals is not required 
>>>>>>> for an experiment, but may be good to reach out nevertheless.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Web developers: No signals
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd say 
>>>>>>> https://discourse.wicg.io/t/proposal-capture-handle-bootstrap-app-collaboration-when-screensharing/5354/
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> gives you a strong positive signal..
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Reason this experiment is being extended
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Enthusiastic support for the feature: 
>>>>>>>> https://discourse.wicg.io/t/proposal-capture-handle-bootstrap-app-collaboration-when-screensharing/5354
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> Efforts to build useful features on top of this new API are still 
>>>>>>>> ongoing.
>>>>>>>> Request extension m95-m97 (three months).
>>>>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No DevTools support is needed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>>>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Supported on all Desktop platforms. Not supported on any Mobile 
>>>>>>>> platform.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>>>>> ?No
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Flag nameCaptureHandle
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tracking bug
>>>>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1200910
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Launch bug
>>>>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1200907
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>>>>> OriginTrial desktop first 92
>>>>>>>> OriginTrial desktop last 94Request extension m95-m97 (three 
>>>>>>>> months).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>>>> https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/4854125411958784
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Links to previous Intent discussionsIntent to prototype: 
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/yLTykllpNmI
>>>>>>>> Intent to Experiment: 
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/RKONugfoGwM/m/mpFizHPxAwAJ
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>>>>> <https://www.chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAMO6jDOMkgjL_HUMohx4hk7tbC__M53aX3NEiGxeTPfw8nJUHw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAMO6jDOMkgjL_HUMohx4hk7tbC__M53aX3NEiGxeTPfw8nJUHw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/ecba514a-77be-4f6a-b3a2-faeb56ecc7f2n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to