I am currently moving the feature through chrome's experimentation
channels. I will update the tracking bug when it is enabled by default:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=649162

On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 4:27 AM prerana wankhade <preranawankha...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello Team,
>
> Do we have any update on the ongoing "Autofill in ShadowDOM" issue, is
> there a solution in place, if not then when can we expect the release/live?
>
> Thanks in Advance,
> Prerana
>
> On Tuesday, February 22, 2022 at 10:42:28 PM UTC+5:30 Joey Arhar wrote:
>
>> > Does this works in other browsers? Have we reported bugs if it doesn't?
>>
>> I just found this WebKit bug someone else reported:
>> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172567
>> I'm guessing this means it doesn't work in WebKit, at least.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 12:21 PM Joey Arhar <jar...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> > The required “Debuggability” section was left empty. Per the guide at
>>> https://goo.gle/devtools-checklist, we need to ensure that DevTools
>>> supports basic display and editing of new HTML features — which would
>>> likely work out-of-the-box anyhow. Please follow this guide and elaborate
>>> on how developers would inspect & debug this new feature please. Thanks!
>>>
>>> Apologies for leaving this empty. As far as I know, there is
>>> unfortunately no existing debuggability of autofill in DevTools in general.
>>> I'm not sure what autofill debugging would look like, but if that ever
>>> happens, I'd be happy to add in any logic for this feature if needed.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 3:20 AM Changhao Han <chang...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The required “Debuggability” section was left empty. Per the guide at
>>>> https://goo.gle/devtools-checklist, we need to ensure that DevTools
>>>> supports basic display and editing of new HTML features — which would
>>>> likely work out-of-the-box anyhow. Please follow this guide and elaborate
>>>> on how developers would inspect & debug this new feature please. Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, February 16, 2022 at 7:30:31 PM UTC+1 Joey Arhar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > Yeah, and there's already an issue about that:
>>>>> > https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/27118
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks! I'll watch this in case I can ever add WPTs for this.
>>>>>
>>>>> > Does this works in other browsers? Have we reported bugs if it
>>>>> doesn't?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think other browsers do this, but I couldn't get autofill to
>>>>> even fill the non-ShadowDOM input on my test page on firefox or safari...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 1:39 AM Manuel Rego Casasnovas <
>>>>> re...@igalia.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> LGTM3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some comments inline.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 16/02/2022 00:39, Mike Taylor wrote:
>>>>>> >>                 Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>         I believe there is low compat risk. As far as I know, much
>>>>>> >>         autofill behavior already diverges between browsers.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>         Gecko: No signal
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>         WebKit: No signal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does this works in other browsers? Have we reported bugs if it
>>>>>> doesn't?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>                 Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>>> >>                 <
>>>>>> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md
>>>>>> >?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>         No. Autofill is not testable in WPT, as far as I know. In
>>>>>> >>         order to test this feature, I had to make C++ browser
>>>>>> tests.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, and there's already an issue about that:
>>>>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/27118
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>   Rego
>>>>>>
>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAK6btw%2ByjxDFHRLWaCz3JMJPc-JoDgfzbEiOLPvcpnQf27fVtg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to