On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 10:55 PM Daniel Bratell <[email protected]> wrote:
> If Mozilla is already shipping this behaviour, then there is no need to > ask them if they support that change. We do assume that they approve of all > functionality they are shipping. > I want to address this point, as I think Chris Harrelson has done. Just because something ships in Firefox, that doesn't mean we think that it is good for the web. There's something of a long list of things we don't like, but ship for various reasons despite that. To pick an example that isn't particularly controversial, we still ship unsecured HTTP. So we do appreciate you asking directly rather than making inferences and then potentially misrepresenting our position. To save a bit of time on this bit of minutiae: this change is good and the work that Johann, Mike, and others on the Chrome team have done to improve compatibility with cookies is greatly appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPLxc%3DVS9cAg7tGDRoT43sgKFeBscaExMMsgOjaX3YR-_dH6OQ%40mail.gmail.com.
