I was taking a look at the explainer for LazyEmbeds [1], and I thought that 
the first sentence could have been more clear if it didn’t use the terms 
“third-party” and “first-party”.

> Third-party embeds enable sites to integrate engaging web experiences 
hosted by third-party origins on a first-party site.

I think this could have been written more clearly like so:

“Cross-site embeds enable sites to integrate engaging web experiences 
hosted by other sites.”

Also take a look at this document that argues against using the terms 
“first party” and “third party” in specs: 
https://tess.oconnor.cx/2020/10/parties

If the moderators agree with this suggestion, please consider posting a PSA 
about it in this group.

[1]: 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/PhLkO3KITyw/m/dMl_Nf5aAgAJ

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/425dc68e-ca1e-468d-bd39-4f18c677892fn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to