I see, thanks for checking that! It’s worth checking that our test results
match other browsers who have implemented, in case they can reveal
different choices or interpretations of the spec.

LGTM1

On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 16:54 Daniil Sakhapov <sakha...@google.com> wrote:

> Safari has claimed to implement rlh, but nothing else I guess. None of
> them are in Firefox.
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:11 AM Philip Jägenstedt <foo...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I see the Gecko issue has now been resolved as positive, which is great.
>>
>> Are any of these units already supported in Firefox or Safari, or would
>> we be the first to ship all of them? (I took a look at one test and have a
>> guess, but just as well to ask.)
>>
>> On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 at 01:48 Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/5/23 5:07 AM, 'Daniil Sakhapov' via blink-dev wrote:
>>>
>>> Contact emails sakha...@chromium.org
>>>
>>> Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#font-relative-lengths
>>>
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> Allows usage of root font units. Currently only 'rem' is supported in
>>> Blink. This feature supports root element variants of ex, ch, ic, and lh
>>> too.
>>>
>>> Blink component Blink>CSS
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ECSS>
>>>
>>> Search tags rlh <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:rlh>, ric
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:ric>, rch
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:rch>, rex
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:rex>, root font
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:root%20font>
>>>
>>> TAG review The feature is not fundamental and only implements an
>>> existing standard
>>>
>>> Note that CSS Values and Units Level 4 is not yet a standard, but a working
>>> draft <https://www.w3.org/standards/types#WD>.
>>>
>>> That said, it seems the TAG recently reviewed the draft spec and was
>>> satisfied with it:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/781
>>>
>>>
>>> TAG review status Not applicable
>>>
>>> Risks
>>>
>>>
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: No signal (
>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/725)
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/112)
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>
>>> *Other signals*:
>>>
>>> WebView application risks
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>
>>> no
>>>
>>>
>>> Debuggability
>>>
>>> The new units should be automatically supported by devtools. No need for
>>> any changes.
>>>
>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>>> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)? Yes
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ? Yes
>>> https://wpt.fyi/css/css-values/rlh-invalidation.html
>>> https://wpt.fyi/css/css-values/ric-invalidation.html
>>> https://wpt.fyi/css/css-values/rch-invalidation.html
>>> https://wpt.fyi/css/css-values/rex-invalidation.html
>>> https://wpt.fyi/css/css-values/lh-rlh-on-root-001.html
>>>
>>> https://wpt.fyi/css/css-typed-om/stylevalue-subclasses/numeric-objects/cssUnitValue.html
>>>
>>> https://wpt.fyi/css/css-contain/container-queries/font-relative-units.html
>>>
>>> https://wpt.fyi/css/css-contain/container-queries/font-relative-units-dynamic.html
>>>
>>> Flag name #enable-experimental-web-platform-features /
>>> CSSNewRootFontUnits (Blink)
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome? False
>>>
>>> Tracking bug
>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1381037
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones
>>> DevTrial on desktop 111
>>> DevTrial on Android 111
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5073969265246208
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAK_fkKV3D8Gpno7mie4LD5B%2BNiGvjfnRvAtJ5rsiBWYL8Mv2Bw%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAK_fkKV3D8Gpno7mie4LD5B%2BNiGvjfnRvAtJ5rsiBWYL8Mv2Bw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/925d0226-4c69-1c28-13b1-59854c1617ca%40chromium.org
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/925d0226-4c69-1c28-13b1-59854c1617ca%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAARdPYe8h2RHvZgHHsZ5xdrx8sKbhgSamZof6xkq2p9qV8Bobw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to