If this only ever caused connections that previously failed to now succeed
as they do in other browsers, then the risk of it causing a compat issue is
exceedingly low right? Perhaps this is more of a bugfix than a breaking API
change?

I see the implementation is already behind a base::Feature. One option
would be to add a UseCounter and turn the feature on to 100% via finch.
Then we can check the UseCounter data in beta and turn the finch flag off
if it's surprisingly high. Thoughts?

Rick

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:21 AM Yoav Weiss <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 3:32 PM Jiacheng Guo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> We don't currently have a use counter for it.
>> Does it make sense to add the port overflow check under a flag and a
>> usecounter as well to record the frequency of setting URL ports with an
>> overflow value.
>>
>
> I think it would make sense. If there's time pressure, we may not even
> have to wait till the usecounter hits stable and use the internal UMA
> equivalent to get a read of what current impacted usage is like. With any
> luck, it'd be close to 0, and we'd be able to go ahead. At the same time,
> having those usage numbers would help reassure us that breakage is not
> significant.
>
>
>> We can collect data first and then gradually enable the feature based on
>> the data we collected.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:01 PM Yoav Weiss <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 2:23 PM 'Jiacheng Guo' via blink-dev <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The implementation can be found at
>>>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4252309
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 9:39 PM Jiacheng Guo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Contact [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> ExplainerThis is an implementation of an established standard.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> An explainer (even inline) helps to understand what change you're trying
>>> to ship, regardless of its spec status.
>>> At the same time, the explanation you included in your summary does that.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Specificationhttps://url.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-url-port
>>>>>
>>>>> Summary
>>>>>
>>>>> The port value will be checked when setting url.port. All the values
>>>>> that overflows the 16-bit numeric limit will be no longer valid. For
>>>>> instance the following script behave differently after the change: ``` u =
>>>>> new URL("http://test.com";); u.port = 65536; console.log(u.port); ```
>>>>> Before the change the output is 65536. After the change the output will be
>>>>> 80.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> Do we have a usecounter for this?
>>>
>>> Do I understand correctly and the current behavior would cause requests
>>> that are based on such URL values to fail, given that the port number
>>> exceeds what's permitted on the network protocol?
>>> If that's the case, this change could cause such requests to "succeed"
>>> even though they are sent to a different origin than what the developer had
>>> in mind.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blink componentBlink>JavaScript>API
>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EJavaScript%3EAPI>
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review statusNot applicable
>>>>>
>>>>> Risks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebKit*: Shipped/Shipping
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>>>
>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>
>>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>>
>>>>> No signals
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>> ?Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Flag nameURLSetPortCheckOverflow
>>>>>
>>>>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>>>>
>>>>> Tracking bughttps://crbug.com/1416017
>>>>>
>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>>
>>>>> No milestones specified
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>>
>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>> of
>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5097311074516992
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAJQw1NyQV7zuDODbvobJK%2BK_WeSX%2B-Bq5S80RAQqQZmy2NZxqw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAJQw1NyQV7zuDODbvobJK%2BK_WeSX%2B-Bq5S80RAQqQZmy2NZxqw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfXNj3LDqQ0H%3DUE_p3zML%3DTRksMzb%3Dtc25EmtkaaCPNa3w%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfXNj3LDqQ0H%3DUE_p3zML%3DTRksMzb%3Dtc25EmtkaaCPNa3w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY-yXQJqzEaZfv0spf2xybkfhCKT9tpw2nLRc6xcUTwEVg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to