Indeed, thanks David!!
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 11:27 AM Manuel Rego Casasnovas <r...@igalia.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > Thanks for the amazing email! > > On 23/02/2023 23:52, David Baron wrote: > > I don't think the specification was designed around the idea that some > > implementations would follow the spec's rules on synthesis and some > > implementations would ignore the spec... and thus it does appear to be a > > problem that whether an implementation does synthesis isn't detectable. > > (This seems worth discussing in the CSS Working Group if it hasn't been > > already.) > > There's a CSSWG issue about this topic in particular: > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7441 Is this something that can be put on the agenda for the CSSWG to discuss? Anecdotally, it seems like developers do <https://typo.social/@pixelambacht/109914810536116259> expect <https://typo.social/@Webtypography/109915500858862298> synthesis to work, which echoes the CSSWG issue (filed by a developer AFAICT). > > Cheers, > Rego > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfWjUPPGzibY%2BUGyQfE%3Df42wswzUwH%3DQtcCe22taf4-ayQ%40mail.gmail.com.
