On 3/1/23 11:59 PM, Mike Taylor wrote:

On 3/1/23 3:41 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 10:14 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:


    Can you file a WebKit position?


I wonder if this might not be necessary for features that are part of Interop 2023? I think given the veto process in how that list is assembled, that guarantees at least a "neutral" position from all vendors. (Knowing whether WebKit feels "positive" or "neutral" about the feature might be interesting, but doesn't feel like a great use of our or their time, at least for small features like this.)

I like this idea, but let's move this part of the discussion to blink-api-owners-discuss@ (I can start a thread), and we can circle back with an update on the consensus view.

The API OWNERS (Alex, Chris, Rick, Yoav, Philip, Daniel, me... hopefully not leaving anyone out) discussed this in our last meeting. After consulting with WebKit and Mozilla, and not receiving a super enthusiastic response to the proposal, we've decided to keep the process as-is for Interop 2023 features and keep requesting positions.

thanks,
Mike

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/06300c7e-a7d9-f762-7ba0-005f5b0b0342%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to