On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:24 AM Markus Handell <hande...@google.com> wrote:
> >> Thanks for filing >> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/39642, I've asked >> there for more details on what it would take to test this. >> >> > I added some more detail there. > > >> The spec change added two dictionary members to >> https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-record/#mediarecorderoptions-section >> which means that it would at least be possible to add a test for >> videoKeyFrameIntervalDuration and videoKeyFrameIntervalCount being >> present. Can you write such a test? >> >> > Yes! > Thanks! It won't test the behavior, but will at least let the tests show if there's some support or not, and catch typos in IDL, which happens. > Also, I think vendor signals here aren't needed given the reviews on >> https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-record/pull/216, but can you file >> bugs for Gecko and WebKit? > > > Bugs filed: > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256031 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1830236 > Thank you! Skimming https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-record/#mediarecorderoptions-section I have just one more question about interop here. The spec says "If both videoKeyFrameIntervalDuration and videoKeyFrameIntervalCount are not null, the UA may ignore either." It seems to me an implementation will definitely pick one of them to ignore and it will be deterministic. Is there any reason to leave this up to the UA instead of writing in the spec which takes precedent? Best regards, Philip > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAARdPYenqKecYCZSeTkT6FA613MLO_MPX0rLvNKecd9q8C5guw%40mail.gmail.com.
