LGTM2; looking forward to this launching.

On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 8:55:07 AM UTC-7 Rick Byers wrote:

> LGTM1
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 9:03 AM Daniil Sakhapov <sakha...@chromium.org> 
> wrote:
>
>> Issued the requests: 
>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/187 and 
>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/802.
>>
>> Also note: the spec has been largely finalised, so I don't expect any big 
>> changes, including the issues mentioned by 一丝. 
>> On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 1:39:21 PM UTC+2 Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 1:09 AM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Daniil,
>>>> On 5/11/23 8:38 AM, Daniil Sakhapov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Contact emails sakha...@chromium.org
>>>>
>>>> Explainer As part of the Interop 2023 we ship the rest of the CSS 
>>>> Motion Path. Currently only path() works. And after a spec has been 
>>>> reworked other path types are ready to be shipped. 
>>>>
>>>> Specification https://drafts.fxtf.org/motion
>>>>
>>>> Summary 
>>>>
>>>> Motion path allows authors to position any graphical object and animate 
>>>> it along an author specified path. This allows a number of powerful new 
>>>> transform possibilities, such as positioning using polar coordinates (with 
>>>> the ray() function) rather than the standard rectangular coordinates used 
>>>> by the translate() function, or animating an element along a defined path, 
>>>> making it easy to define complex and beautiful 2d spatial transitions. 
>>>> Paths can be specified as circle(), ellipse(), rect(), inset(), xywh(), 
>>>> polygon(), ray() and url().
>>>>
>>>> Blink component Blink>CSS 
>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ECSS>
>>>>
>>>> TAG review None
>>>>
>>>> TAG review status Not applicable
>>>>
>>>> Any reason why? Has TAG ever reviewed the draft spec?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The feature has been shipping 
>>> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/offset-path#browser_compatibility>
>>>  
>>> since Chrome 55 and Firefox 72, so it's already many years old. I don't 
>>> think a high-level TAG review for this feature would make sense or be a 
>>> good use of time.
>>>
>> -- 
>>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/411f1518-8153-480d-ae23-194bc866c92an%40chromium.org
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/411f1518-8153-480d-ae23-194bc866c92an%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/e78437a3-5079-46b9-9759-032fa9f67148n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to