On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 4:43 PM Chris Thompson <cth...@chromium.org> wrote:

> We're planning to roll this out as a field trial, hopefully starting in
> Chrome 115 at 1% Stable in order to keep an eye impact. We've been testing
> our implementation in Chrome Canary/Dev/Beta channels for a while now to
> help test the feature and polish our implementation, which largely builds
> on Chrome's existing "HTTPS-First Mode" (which is enabled for users who
> toggle the "Always use secure connections" opt-in in Chrome's settings).
>

Thanks!
How are you going to measure the impact? Do you keep an eye on bad
redirects, hangs, people complaining?
Also, will you send out a followup when you go to 100% (or revert)? We'd
like to turn this on in our chromium based browser as well.


> We didn't think that this was a good fit for an Origin Trial as it isn't
> really site (or user) exposed.
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 4:36 PM Rik Cabanier <caban...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is an awesome change that will make the web better!
>> Did you run any experiments or origin trials to see how it works in the
>> field? Are you planning on rolling it out slowly to see the impact?
>>
>> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 4:13 PM Chris Thompson <cth...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Contact emailscth...@chromium.org, dadr...@google.com
>>>
>>> Explainerhttps://github.com/dadrian/https-upgrade/blob/main/explainer.md
>>>
>>> Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1655
>>>
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> Automatically and optimistically upgrade all main-frame navigations to
>>> HTTPS, with fast fallback to HTTP.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blink componentInternals>Network>SSL
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Internals%3ENetwork%3ESSL>
>>>
>>> TAG reviewFetch change process does not mention a TAG review, therefore
>>> this is N/A (https://github.com/whatwg/fetch#pull-requests)
>>>
>>> TAG review statusNot applicable
>>>
>>> Risks
>>>
>>>
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: Positive (
>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/800) Firefox is
>>> offering a similar feature already in their private browsing mode by default
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/185)
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: No signals. This feature is not exposed directly to
>>> web developers or users. However, HTTPS adoption is now standard practice
>>> (>90% of page loads in Chrome use HTTPS), and automatically upgrading
>>> navigations to HTTPS would avoid unnecessary redirects from HTTP to HTTPS
>>> for site owners. The `upgrade-insecure-requests` header has some similar
>>> functionality, and according to HTTP-Archive is found on ~6% of all
>>> requests.
>>>
>>> *Other signals*:
>>>
>>> WebView application risks
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Debuggability
>>>
>>> Chrome will upgrade these navigations to HTTPS using a 307 internal
>>> redirect, which will be visible in the Network panel of Developer Tools.
>>>
>>>
>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>>> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?No
>>>
>>> Currently not available on Android WebView. We are implementing this
>>> first for Chrome and will consider bringing this to WebView (likely as an
>>> embedder opt-in) as follow up work.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ?No
>>>
>>> Flag namehttps-upgrades
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome?True
>>>
>>> Tracking bug
>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1394910
>>>
>>> Launch bughttps://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4235192
>>>
>>> Sample links
>>> http://example.com will upgrade to https://example.com.
>>> http://www.alwayshttp.com will upgrade to https://www.alwayshttp.com but
>>> fall back to http://www.alwayshttp.com because the site doesn't support
>>> HTTPS.
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones
>>> Shipping on desktop 115
>>> Shipping on Android 115
>>>
>>> We are planning to do a field trial to gradually roll out this feature
>>> to Chrome clients in Chrome 115.
>>>
>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>
>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>> https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1655
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6056181032812544
>>>
>>> Links to previous Intent discussionsIntent to prototype:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/mgJqym5-Xek/m/0EAN6v7CCQAJ
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CALMy46TuPDmzpr8udxXEythTCMVDBVVuTKwQivGGxm5fhJ-Xfg%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CALMy46TuPDmzpr8udxXEythTCMVDBVVuTKwQivGGxm5fhJ-Xfg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGN7qDAP_u0PRqva-_SPqeJcR8BLRV4EdpspROA7FAEvVKv-fA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to