LGTM3

Thanks for ensuring the behavior changes are behind a kill-switch!

Rick

On Wed, May 31, 2023, 5:10 a.m. Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:

> LGTM2 (% Mike's question)
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:04 AM Mike West <mk...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> LGTM1.
>>
>> The risks you point to seem minor, and following along with Safari's
>> implementation makes it more likely that we can land the feature in a way
>> that sticks. Do you have insight into Mozilla's implementation progress?
>>
>> -mike
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:47 AM Scott Haseley <shase...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Contact emailsshase...@chromium.org
>>>
>>> Explainer
>>> https://github.com/shaseley/abort-signal-any/blob/main/README.md
>>>
>>> Specificationhttps://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-abortsignal-any
>>> https://wicg.github.io/scheduling-apis/#dom-tasksignal-any (TaskSignal
>>> specialization)
>>>
>>> Design docs
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LvmsBLV85p-PhSGvTH-YwgD6onuhh1VXLg8jPlH32H4/edit#heading=h.xp6e50wyimb4
>>>
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> AbortSignal.any(signals) returns a signal that is aborted when any of
>>> the source signals are aborted. Developers can use this to combine
>>> independent abort sources, e.g. timeouts specified with
>>> AbortSignal.timeout() and signals associated with user input, and pass them
>>> to async APIs like fetch().
>>>
>>> Comments
>>> This intent also includes TaskSignal.any(), which is a specialization of
>>> AbortSignal.any() (TaskSignal inherits from AbortSignal) for
>>> https://wicg.github.io/scheduling-apis/. The specialization behaves the
>>> same for abort, but returns a TaskSignal with the priority bit initialized
>>> from the additional optional parameter. TaskSignal is only implemented in
>>> Chromium, and this is a small addition to keep the API in sync with the
>>> base class.
>>>
>>> Blink componentBlink>DOM
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EDOM>
>>>
>>> TAG reviewhttps://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/737
>>>
>>> TAG review statusIssues addressed
>>>
>>> Risks
>>>
>>>
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>
>>> There's a slight compat risk resulting from spec changes associated with
>>> the new feature.
>>>
>>>
>>> Signals could previously be combined (in specs) similarly using the
>>> "follow" algorithm, which was replaced with a new algorithm for creating a
>>> dependent signal. The new algorithm changes the order the abort event is
>>> propagated between source and dependent signals, which was done to optimize
>>> memory management (one of the API goals) and limit complexity. This is
>>> observable in two ways: 1. In fetch, `new Request(url, {signal})` and
>>> `request.clone()` made a "copy" of the input signal using "follow", so the
>>> relative order of 'abort' events between 'signal' and `request.signal` can
>>> change. For example: ``` // Previously, handler2 ran before handler1, if
>>> the signal is aborted. signal.addEventListener('abort', handler1); const r
>>> = new Request(url, {signal}); r.signal.addEventListener('abort', handler2);
>>> ``` `clone()` is similar (one WPT test was changed for the new
>>> expectation). 2. Our cache.addAll() implementation had an unspecced use of
>>> "follow" that could result in 'abort' events firing when they shouldn't
>>> have. This was fixed. The risk seems low here, and we didn't think changing
>>> the API implementation to ensure this order was worth the
>>> complexity/optimization limitations. The feature can be disabled via kill
>>> switch (AbortSignalAny) if necessary.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: Positive (
>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/774)
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: Shipped/Shipping (
>>> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256176)
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>
>>> Probably "mildly positive":
>>>  - 4 stars on implementation bug (crbug.com/13233910)
>>>  - Discussion/motivation on DOM issue (
>>> https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/920
>>>  - A couple libraries implement something similar (
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/ve96pn/abortcontroller_is_your_friend/
>>> )
>>>
>>> *Other signals*:
>>> Implemented in Node.js: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/47821
>>>
>>> Ergonomics
>>>
>>> This is designed to be used with other AbortSignal APIs (AbortController
>>> and AbortSignal.timeout), and improves ergonomics of handling multiple
>>> signals.
>>>
>>>
>>> Activation
>>>
>>> The feature would benefit from a polyfill.
>>>
>>>
>>> Security
>>>
>>> None.
>>> https://github.com/shaseley/abort-signal-any/blob/main/tag-questionnaire.md
>>>
>>>
>>> WebView application risks
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>
>>> See compat section.
>>>
>>>
>>> Debuggability
>>>
>>> Basic support only.
>>>
>>>
>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>>> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?Yes
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ?Yes
>>>
>>> Flag name--enable-blink-features=AbortSignalAny
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>>
>>> Tracking bug
>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1323391
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones
>>> Shipping on desktop 116
>>> Shipping on Android 116
>>> Shipping on WebView 116
>>>
>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>
>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5202879349522432
>>>
>>> Links to previous Intent discussionsIntent to prototype:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXGoJ2siKxHbAB3YL%2BX1%2BNvRvOXGYKCc_Ybyq7azqd-_AS4rg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXGoJ3%3DYz%3Di2cdJJUQVc4Uxh1Up2AaWj1Uw50qHBjiU_8PP6w%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXGoJ3%3DYz%3Di2cdJJUQVc4Uxh1Up2AaWj1Uw50qHBjiU_8PP6w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXHy%3DdPLTWx4a-5z7USY6CjVC8smwYYaq-%2ByGKe9w99HKieeg%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXHy%3DdPLTWx4a-5z7USY6CjVC8smwYYaq-%2ByGKe9w99HKieeg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfXOwYLx2jx%2B67MC532_d40p0giB3xA0n8sUFrsC0XUzsg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfXOwYLx2jx%2B67MC532_d40p0giB3xA0n8sUFrsC0XUzsg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY_807NN3cyEWDrXC%3DD6Ktie6j0p0ArY%3DjAdnDtDWrCYeg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to