LGTM3, but please send this as an FYI to the TAG. There's no such thing as 
a "small feature" in terms of consistency and potential for architectural 
impact.

On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 7:44:55 AM UTC-7 Chris Harrelson wrote:

> LGTM2
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 7:42 AM Mike Taylor <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>> LGTM1
>> On 6/21/23 2:32 AM, 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev wrote:
>>
>> Contact emails 
>>
>>
>> * [email protected] <[email protected]> [email protected] 
>> <[email protected]> * Explainer 
>>
>>
>> * https://github.com/WICG/webusb/pull/233#issue-1760530134 
>> <https://github.com/WICG/webusb/pull/233#issue-1760530134> * 
>> Specification 
>>
>>
>> * 
>> https://wicg.github.io/webusb/#dom-usbdevicerequestoptions-exclusionfilters 
>> <https://wicg.github.io/webusb/#dom-usbdevicerequestoptions-exclusionfilters>
>>  
>> https://github.com/WICG/webusb/pull/233 
>> <https://github.com/WICG/webusb/pull/233> * Summary 
>>
>>
>> * The "exclusionFilters" option in navigator.usb.requestDevice() allows 
>> web developers to exclude some devices from the browser picker. It can be 
>> used to exclude devices that match a broader filter but are unsupported. * 
>> Blink 
>> component 
>>
>>
>> * Blink>USB 
>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EUSB> * 
>> Motivation 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> * Allowing web developers, through the "exclusionFilters" option, to 
>> exclude from the browser picker some devices that are not supported by the 
>> site will improve user experience. Without it, web developers let users 
>> pick a device, then have to check using a custom JavaScript helper function 
>> and alert the user after they’ve already selected a device, resulting in a 
>> poor user experience. // Request access to a device from vendor ID 0xABCD. 
>> // The device with product ID 0x1234 has been reported as unsupported. 
>> const device = await navigator.usb.requestDevice({   filters: [{ vendorId: 
>> 0xABCD }],   exclusionFilters: [{ vendorId: 0xABCD, productId: 0x1234 }], 
>> }); This feature is similar to Web Bluetooth and WebHID "exclusionFilters" 
>> options. See https://chromestatus.com/features#exclusionFilters 
>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#exclusionFilters> * TAG review 
>>
>>
>> * This small addition to the WebUSB API doesn’t seem to qualify for a TAG 
>> review. FYI We have filed one for Web Bluetooth "exclusionFilters" option 
>> recently which was marked as satisfied at 
>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/830 
>> <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/830> * TAG review status 
>>
>>
>> * Not Applicable * Risks 
>> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> * Older browsers will ignore exclusionFilters and all devices matching 
>> the provided filter will be displayed (the current behavior). Signals from 
>> other implementations (Gecko, WebKit):  Gecko: No Signal [1] WebKit: No 
>> Signal [1] Web / Framework developers: Positive 
>> https://github.com/WICG/webusb/issues/232 
>> <https://github.com/WICG/webusb/issues/232> [1] Both Gecko and WebKit are 
>> unlikely to object to this feature specifically, but object to the overall 
>> WebUSB API as a whole, hence it doesn't make sense to bug them with 
>> specific questions on this. Activation: This feature can't be polyfilled. 
>> It should be fairly trivial for developers to adopt this new feature. * 
>> Debuggability 
>>
>>
>> * No specific DevTools changes are required. This feature is treated like 
>> any other JS method. Note that exposing DevTools debugging support for 
>> device-access APIs (WebUSB included) is discussed at 
>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1142566#c20 
>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1142566#c20>. * Is 
>> this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>> ? 
>>
>>
>> * No, because browser picker implementation is implemented outside of 
>> Blink and so isn’t testable fully by web-platform-tests.  * Requires 
>> code in //chrome? 
>>
>>
>> * Yes, the browser picker implementation is part of the UI code in 
>> //chrome. * Tracking bug 
>>
>>
>>
>> * https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1455392 
>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1455392> Estimated 
>> milestones 117 * Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>>
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5172269315260416
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPpwU5%2BGr-iskzoo-kUhH2%2BFNJL6-OyG44m6jFW1jZXMw3%3DUHg%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPpwU5%2BGr-iskzoo-kUhH2%2BFNJL6-OyG44m6jFW1jZXMw3%3DUHg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/38ae19dd-0a89-bf22-9d03-d8021862fe7e%40chromium.org
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/38ae19dd-0a89-bf22-9d03-d8021862fe7e%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/8a4cee4d-5f9b-4703-ae41-26c610ec7b3cn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to