On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:35 PM Vladimir Levin <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 1:12 PM Vladimir Levin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for your feedback. My responses are inline below
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:24 AM Yoav Weiss <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 10:19 PM 'Vladimir Levin' via blink-dev <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Contact [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> SpecificationNone
>>>>
>>>> Summary
>>>>
>>>> This feature extends the existing contain-intrinsic-size syntax: none |
>>>> <length> | auto && <length> to also include auto && none: none | <length> |
>>>> auto && <length> | auto && none The reason for this change is the CSSWG
>>>> resolution (
>>>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8407#issuecomment-1440466558)
>>>> to add an interaction between content-visibility: auto and
>>>> contain-intrinsic-size. Specifically, that the former adds an "auto"
>>>> keyword to the latter. For this to work, the resolution includes a note to
>>>> extend contain-intrinsic-size syntax for "auto" to work with all existing
>>>> keywords, including "none".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blink componentBlink>CSS
>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ECSS>
>>>>
>>>> TAG reviewNone
>>>>
>>>> TAG review statusNot applicable
>>>>
>>>> Risks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>
>>>> There is a risk of interoperability since the new syntax would
>>>> previously be considered invalid, and result in a default behavior
>>>> (equivalent to contain-intrinsic-size: none). Sites currently specifying
>>>> contain-intrinsic-size: auto none would have their behavior change on
>>>> Chromium after this feature launches.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I estimate this risk to be low.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Would you be able to confirm that estimate e.g. with an HTTP archive
>>> search?
>>>
>>
>> I'm in the process of figuring out how to do this, and will get back to
>> you with the results when I have them. My estimate stems from the fact that
>> currently "contain-intrinsic-size: auto none" is considered an invalid
>> syntax, making it unlikely to be used as a value.
>>
>
> Based on my http archive queries that use regular expression to match
> particular values of contain-intrinsic-[a-z-]* (size, width, height,
> block-size, inline-size), out of all of the contain-intrinsic-* values, *about
> half of them (50%) have an 'auto' keyword *that follows the semicolon and
> possibly whitespace. *However, 0 of those have "auto[ ]*none" in them*.
>
> As a disclaimer, the total amount of contain-intrinsic-* pages I got using
> these queries is substantially smaller than the use counter data would
> indicate. I presume this is due to limitations such as case sensitivity,
> script constructing these values, etc, but I'm not sure.
>
> This seems to confirm my estimate of low risk in enabling this by default.
> Let me know if you agree, or whether you'd like me to do more research.
>

Thanks for confirming that!!


>
> Thanks in advance,
> vmpstr
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Gecko*: No signal This change was discussed in CSSWG and there were
>>>> no objections to the resolutions
>>>>
>>>> *WebKit*: No signal This change was discussed in CSSWG and there were
>>>> no objections to the resolutions
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can you please file signals? I don't believe a CSSWG counts as a
>>> positive signal. Also, I don't believe I saw a comment from any WebKit
>>> person on the minutes.
>>> A signal request would let them know this is being worked on in Chromium.
>>>
>>
>> I have filed the following requests for positions:
>> Mozilla: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/827
>> WebKit: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/205
>>
>
Both positions indicate there are open spec questions. Can you expand on
those and their future compat/interop risk?


>
>> I've updated the chrome status entry page with this information.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> vmpstr
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>>
>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>
>>>> Ergonomics
>>>>
>>>> None. This is an improvement which will allow future work to improve
>>>> ergonomics of content-visibility.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Activation
>>>>
>>>> None.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Security
>>>>
>>>> None.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>
>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Debuggability
>>>>
>>>> This feature is debuggable in the same way as other CSS features.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?Yes
>>>>
>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>> ?Yes
>>>>
>>>> Flag nameCSSContainIntrinsicSizeAutoNone
>>>>
>>>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>>>
>>>> Tracking bug
>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1453733
>>>>
>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>
>>>> M116
>>>>
>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>
>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6203168806928384
>>>>
>>>> Links to previous Intent discussions
>>>>
>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CADsXd2MgWYdmrJ1JHv0rYTWr2wcqUQ%2BZUriH5UQAREw7Wg0Ptg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CADsXd2MgWYdmrJ1JHv0rYTWr2wcqUQ%2BZUriH5UQAREw7Wg0Ptg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfVSmPFPO4H7%2BuRiQas4rQ_Us2YLhwqfPZXrww8JrUya5Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to