LGTM1

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 5:31 PM Paul Jensen <pauljen...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Contact emails
>
> pauljen...@chromium.org
>
> Explainer
>
>
> https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/639/files?short_path=d65ba97#diff-d65ba9778fe3af46de3edfce2266b5b035192f8869280ec07179963b81f4e624
>
>
> https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/486/files?short_path=d65ba97#diff-d65ba9778fe3af46de3edfce2266b5b035192f8869280ec07179963b81f4e624
>
> Specification
>
> https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/711
>
> https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/636
>
> Summary
>
> This I2S covers two features extending Protected Audience:
>
> Recency:
>
> The “recency” signal for Protected Audience interest groups indicates how
> long ago the user was joined to an interest group, which can be a useful
> signal when calculating an ad auction bid (e.g. recently expressed interest
> likely indicates more interest).  Previously we provided this signal in a
> strictly bucketed and noised form to buyers’ win reporting function,
> reportWin(). <https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/issues/435>  This change
> additionally exposes this signal to the buyers’ bidding function,
> generateBid().  It can be provided without bucketing or noising to
> generateBid() like other signals available in that function. In fact,
> Protected Audience already allows developers to calculate this signal (e.g.
> by storing join time in the interest group), but developers have asked (see
> “Web Developers” section below) to have the browser supply it to
> generateBid() to ensure it’s calculated identically to the value supplied
> to the reporting function, so that models training on the reported data are
> compatible with bidding.
>
> Rounding bids and scores:
>
> In Protected Audience, the bid price and desirability score pass from
> functions that have access to cross-site data (generateBid() and scoreAd())
> to the reporting worklets that have access to first party data (reportWin()
> and reportResult()), so to prevent event-level win reports from
> facilitating cross-site identity joins, we need to limit this data as much
> as possible.  This change limits the information in the bid price and
> desirability score by rounding them from 64-bit floating-point numbers to
> 16-bit floating point numbers. Previously these numbers were not rounded.
>
> Blink component
>
> Blink>InterestGroups
> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EInterestGroups>
>
> TAG review
>
> The parent proposal, Protected Audience, is still pending:
> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/723
>
> TAG review status
>
> Pending
>
> Risks
> Interoperability and Compatibility
>
> Recency: This is unlikely to break existing sites as it’s only adding a
> new field to an object the browser provides to Protected Audience bidding
> and scoring scripts.
>
> Rounding: This is unlikely to break existing sites as it’s only clearing
> some of the less significant bits of the bid and score values, while not
> changing the most significant bits or where the values flow from and to.
>
> Gecko & WebKit: No signal on parent proposal, Protected Audience.  Asked
> here <https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/770> and here
> <https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/158>.
>
> Web developers:
>
> Recency: Adtechs asked for the recency feature here
> <https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/issues/435#issuecomment-1592103934>
> as part of the larger ask <https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/issues/435>.
>
> Rounding: This has been part of Protected Audience’s plan to accomplish
> our privacy goals for some time.  We haven’t heard significant resistance.
>
> Debuggability
>
> These features affect values provided to Protected Audience scripts
> (generateBid(), reportResult(), reportWin()) which are debuggable via
> Chrome DevTools.
>
> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>
> It will be supported on all platforms that support Protected Audience, so
> all but WebView.
>
> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
> ?
>
> These are in progress and hope to land before M116 stable release.
>
> Finch feature name
>
> FledgeRounding
>
> Requires code in //chrome?
>
> False
>
> Estimated milestones
>
> Shipping on desktop and Android in M116.
>
> Anticipated spec changes
>
> None related to these two features.
>
> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5084137479733248
>
> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CABQTWr%3DfU5ucEnyYgx6Xg5wpmX4q9MOqBryOjLQN17E7ANafrA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CABQTWr%3DfU5ucEnyYgx6Xg5wpmX4q9MOqBryOjLQN17E7ANafrA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw8zTzGiCMFfAn1E1269aQrFEEZuJsBKau64pxVMVo8E8Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to