LGTM2

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 21:20 Mike Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> LGTM1
> On 8/23/23 2:11 PM, Mathias Bynens wrote:
>
> Thank you for the detailed explanation. Proceeding as you described SGTM.
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 7:41 PM Raphael Kubo da Costa <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Mathias.
>>
>> Mathias Bynens <[email protected]> writes:
>> > Question 1: Are they supportive of the Generic Sensor API?
>>
>> Officially, no. It has been quite a while since we last asked them
>> though.
>>
>> See the discussion with Mozilla here:
>> - https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/35
>> and their corresponding standards position here:
>> - https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/#generic-sensor
>>
>> WebKit didn't have a standards position tracker back then, but they did
>> comment on the Mozilla issue above:
>> -
>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/35#issuecomment-718365969
>>
>> We've been trying to address the concerns in the Devices and Sensors WG
>> over the years and this will probably come up in some form at TPAC as
>> well.
>>
>> With that said...
>>
>> > Question 2: Have they provided any signals on the proposed automation
>> > endpoint?
>>
>> I have not asked them given the above (and Apple is not part of the WG,
>> so it's also hard to ask for feedback on any specifics of the new text).
>> Personally, I'd like to do a few things before discussing this API with
>> WebKit and Mozilla again:
>> - Land these automation changes to remove the semi-dependency on Mojo
>>   from the web tests so that it's a lot easier for other implementations
>>   to test their code.
>> - Sort out any permission-related issues the spec might have (although
>>   this is more of an implementation issue, with the Generic Sensors and
>>   Device Orientation APIs in Blink not asking for permission by default
>>   at the moment).
>> - Figure out if the Device Orientation spec (which all engines
>>   implement) itself needs to be more tightly coupled with the Generic
>>   Sensor API, at least for automation, for it to be testable in an
>>   interoperable way.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CADizRgYkZ%3DH3qe8DKZdcm1bLqYnGCLFpyX%3DCBGCV%3DmTWG3EJZg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CADizRgYkZ%3DH3qe8DKZdcm1bLqYnGCLFpyX%3DCBGCV%3DmTWG3EJZg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/eb91049c-9d0f-44a2-bb4c-9987b12d34b0%40chromium.org
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/eb91049c-9d0f-44a2-bb4c-9987b12d34b0%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfV%2BZEtq%3DfezcPuE1GgMLD8eKo_XQQtVc7t9WgxvxcaLJg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to