LGTM2

On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:30 AM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Thanks for the design doc! The quote from kleber@ really helped me to
> understand the use case and developer need. It sounds like this is a small
> tweak to fenced frame event-level reporting, which is itself a temporary
> stepping stone on the path to a more private ads ecosystem. AIUI, this does
> not regress privacy by revealing the event data to more parties, just the
> event itself (by default).
>
> Based on that, LGTM1 to ship.
> On 10/26/23 11:33 AM, Liam Brady wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Apologies for the confusion. I have a design document written that
> explains the motivation for this change:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vLifppH8TC86sl4kbam57egttqb4VNwEkVvZdefGIuQ/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Essentially, if registerAdBeacon() is called for some destination, that
> destination is going to expect to receive automatic beacons. However, with
> the current design, the ad frame is able to arbitrarily prevent automatic
> beacons from reaching certain destinations. We don't think an ad frame
> should determine if a destination gets automatic beacons, but it should
> still be allowed to determine if data is attached to the beacon that is
> sent to destinations.
>
> The explainer PR is waiting for final reviews and approval (I'll try to
> get that taken care of today). The spec PRs have landed. In the future,
> I'll link commits instead of PRs to avoid any confusion.
>
> - Liam
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 7:44 PM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Liam!
>>
>> On 10/20/23 4:37 PM, 'Liam Brady' via blink-dev wrote:
>>
>> Contact emails
>>
>> shivani...@chromium.org jkar...@chromium.org lbr...@google.com
>> Explainer(s)
>>
>> Send Automatic Beacons To All Registered Destinations
>>
>> https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/808
>>
>> FWIW, it's a bit challenging to read an explainer as diffs on GitHub and
>> infer the motivation. For future intents, could you write up the motivation
>> and use cases for the "updates" elsewhere (gist, comment, inline here), or
>> just land the PR in the existing explainer? Is there any reason the PR
>> hasn't landed?
>>
>> Attempting to mentally patch the diffs to
>> https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/blob/main/Fenced_Frames_Ads_Reporting.md#support-for-attribution-reporting,
>> it seems like this intent is intended to support attribution reporting. And
>> it seems like sending a reporting beacon for the "reserved.top_navigation"
>> event to *all* registered URLs *without* event data is useful. But I
>> don't really know. :) Can you elaborate, assuming my understanding is
>> correct?
>>
>> (One more note - sending a title like "Fenced Frames - Send Automatic
>> Beacons To All Registered Destinations" is a lot more clear than
>> "Functionality Updates")
>>
>>
>> Spec(s)
>>
>> Send Automatic Beacons To All Registered Destinations
>>
>> (Initial version) https://github.com/WICG/fenced-frame/pull/122
>>
>> (Post-security review updates)
>> https://github.com/WICG/fenced-frame/pull/129
>>
>> Similarly, is there any reason the spec PRs haven't landed?
>>
>>
>> Summary
>>
>> One of the capabilities of fenced frames and URN iframes loaded through
>> Protected Audience or Shared Storage is being able to send reporting
>> beacons automatically
>> <https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/blob/main/Fenced_Frames_Ads_Reporting.md#support-for-attribution-reporting>
>> after a top-level navigation. We would like to modify that functionality:
>>
>> Automatic beacons will now send to URLs registered via registerAdBeacon()
>> on reserved.top_navigation calls, but they will not have beacon data
>> attached to the request. Previously, only URLs registered via
>> setReportEventDataForAutomaticBeacons received beacons, and they do have
>> beacon data attached.
>>
>> Note: This chromestatus entry also includes changes to Protected Audience
>> ad size macros. However, it is small enough that it will be taken care of
>> in a separate PSA:
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/3JfA8EUBEgQ
>>
>> Blink component
>>
>> Blink>FencedFrames
>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EFencedFrames>
>>
>> TAG reviews and status
>>
>> Fenced frames existing TAG review appended with these spec changes
>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/838#issuecomment-1765061770
>>
>> Link to Origin Trial feedback summary
>>
>> No Origin Trial performed
>>
>> Is this feature supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>
>> Supported on all the above platforms except Android WebView.
>>
>> Debuggability
>>
>> Additional debugging capabilities are not necessary for these feature
>> changes.
>>
>> Risks
>>
>> Compatibility
>>
>> There are no compatibility risks, as described below:
>>
>> The API shape as exposed to ad frames is not changing. While the
>> assumptions of which sites receive the beacon after calling
>> setReportEventDataForAutomaticBeacons() is changing, no code changes will
>> be required to have existing code work with this new behavior.
>>
>> Interoperability
>>
>> There are no interoperability risks as no other browsers have decided to
>> implement these features yet.
>>
>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?
>> Link to test suite results from wpt.fyi.
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> automatic-beacon-no-destination.https.html (test
>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/fenced-frame/automatic-beacon-no-destination.https.html>)
>> (results
>> <https://wpt.fyi/results/fenced-frame/automatic-beacon-no-destination.https.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned>
>> )
>>
>> automatic-beacon-no-opt-in.https.html (test
>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/fenced-frame/automatic-beacon-no-opt-in.https.html>)
>> (results
>> <https://wpt.fyi/results/fenced-frame/automatic-beacon-no-opt-in.https.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned>
>> )
>>
>> Anticipated spec changes
>>
>> None
>>
>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5140606359175168
>>
>> Links to previous Intent discussions
>>
>> Intent to prototype:
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/Ko9UXQYPgUE/m/URRsB-qvAAAJ
>>
>>
>> Intent to experiment:
>>
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/y6G3cvKXjlg/m/Lcpmpi_LAgAJ
>>
>>
>> Intent to extend origin trial:
>>
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/SD8Ot2gpz4g/m/A9uA-_cGAwAJ
>>
>>
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/gpmaOi3of_w/m/SyMclFhMAAAJ
>>
>>
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/CBrV-2DrYFI/m/RTojC6kHAgAJ
>>
>>
>> Intent to ship:
>>
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/tpw8wW0VenQ/m/mePLTiHlDQAJ
>>
>> Intent to ship for functionality updates:
>>
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2FKlwNZ0J4Q/m/oQmHtp1rAQAJ
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/f317f4d1-c4b7-4a19-8f13-cf6cbbde100dn%40chromium.org
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/f317f4d1-c4b7-4a19-8f13-cf6cbbde100dn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/d7ed7ec9-dcfb-4ec8-acba-5aad465aaeca%40chromium.org
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/d7ed7ec9-dcfb-4ec8-acba-5aad465aaeca%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw_%2BqiXbfu%2BhspiS_CFwGGkgzAyZHbY_Z9R9J2JuCf4DRg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to