They should all be requested now.

Thanks

On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 3:45 PM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Hi Garrett,
>
> Would you mind requesting each of the review gates in the chromestatus
> entry?
>
> thanks,
> Mike
> On 11/7/23 12:24 PM, Garrett Tanzer wrote:
>
> Intent to Ship: Protected Audience - Do Not Disable Cookie Setting in
> ReportEvent until 3PCD (Chrome - 120)
>
>
> Contact emails
>
> shivani...@chromium.org, jkar...@chromium.org, lbr...@google.com,
> gtan...@google.com
>
> Explainer(s)
>
> https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/884
>
> Relevant issue: Don't disable cookie setting in ReportEvent API until 3PCD
> <https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/issues/866>
>
>
> Spec(s):
>
> Since this change is only temporarily allowing cookies in the automatic
> beacons and the functionality change will be deprecated with 3PCD and it
> respects 3PC preferences as cookies do today, it is not added to the spec.
>
>
> Summary
>
> We launched Fenced Frames for Protected Audience as a part of Chrome 115.
> With this change, we are temporarily un-disabling credentials on the automatic
> beacons
> <https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/blob/main/Fenced_Frames_Ads_Reporting.md#support-for-attribution-reporting>
> initiated from a fenced frame (or urn iframe) until 3rd party cookie
> deprecation (3PCD) to help with adoption.
>
> Details
>
> We received a request (https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/issues/866) to
> not disable credentials on automatic beacon reports until 3PCD for both
> fenced frames and urn-iframes, with higher priority for urn iframes. This
> will help adtech in running experiments on Protected Audience. For example,
> the Attribution Reporting API’s verbose debugging feature requires cookies
> to be set in headers, so it is currently broken for automatic beacons.
>
>
> With this change, we will switch the credentials mode for automatic
> beacons only from CredentialsMode::kOmit to CredentialsMode::kInclude.
> Please note:
>
>    -
>
>    This will be gated behind a check that 3rd party cookies are enabled.
>    This has the effect of respecting current user preferences and
>    automatically disabling the change at 3PCD.
>    -
>
>    A parallel change <https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/issues/822>
>    splits up automatic beacons into beacons sent on navigation start and
>    navigation commit. This change will apply to both.
>
>
>
> Blink component
>
> Blink>FencedFrames
> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EFencedFrames>
>
> TAG reviews and status
>
> N/A since there are no spec changes.
>
> Link to Origin Trial feedback summary
>
> No Origin Trial performed
>
> Is this feature supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux,
> Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>
> Supported on all the above platforms except Android WebView.
>
> Debuggability
>
> Additional debugging capabilities are not necessary for these feature
> changes.
>
> Risks
>
> Compatibility
>
> There are no compatibility risks, since existing receiving servers can
> choose to not use the cookies.
>
> Interoperability
>
> There are no interoperability risks as no other browsers have decided to
> implement these features yet.
>
>
> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?
> Link to test suite results from wpt.fyi.
>
> No. This is tested in browser tests. This will not become a part of
> web-standard, so we are not adding any additional tests in the
> web-platform. Links for the original tests are below.
>
> WPT for Fenced Frames:
> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/fenced-frame
>
>
> Anticipated spec changes
>
> None
>
> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5170880732987392
>
> Links to previous Intent discussions
>
> Intent to prototype:
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/Ko9UXQYPgUE/m/URRsB-qvAAAJ
>
>
> Intent to experiment:
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/y6G3cvKXjlg/m/Lcpmpi_LAgAJ
>
>
> Intent to ship:
>
>
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/tpw8wW0VenQ/m/mePLTiHlDQAJ
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFk1C%2BNZrECQ9atA9vbZxjFrVtnW-H6z4yPdUt_4nD1q%3Dot61g%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFk1C%2BNZrECQ9atA9vbZxjFrVtnW-H6z4yPdUt_4nD1q%3Dot61g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CACykZxqOWNtkLOwW71ZiG3Hu9G8xCyTi%2BcpJay1sZFtZ6UaTJQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to